CONTACT US   SUBSCRIBE   PREMIUM   ADVERTISING

68F Hi 84F
Lo 66F

Recent Blog Posts

Archived Clinton Records May Go Public Soon

By JOSH GERSTEIN, Staff Reporter of the Sun | September 13, 2007

An estimated 10,000 pages of daily schedules from Senator Clinton's tenure as first lady could be made public as soon as December, though Presidents Clinton and Bush could postpone the records' release, a National Archives official said yesterday.

"Our hope is to get it done by the end of the year," the acting director of the Clinton Presidential Library, Emily Robison, told The New York Sun. She stressed that she was only referring to the review and redaction of the records by archivists. Under the Presidential Records Act and an executive order issued by Mr. Bush, Mr. Clinton's representatives then have 90 days to review the records for materials that could be covered by executive privilege. After that review is complete, Mr. Bush has an unlimited amount of time to make his own privilege assertions.

It is unclear whether the disclosure of redacted versions of Mrs. Clinton's schedules will ultimately have significance for her bid for the Democratic presidential nomination. However, it seems likely that Mr. Clinton's former aides will have control over the timing of the process just as the nominating contest reaches its peak early next year. The political atmosphere is sure to increase pressure on the former president not to be responsible for any delay.

Ms. Robison said Mrs. Clinton's schedules were given priority in processing because they have been the subject of several Freedom of Information Act requests. A conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch, has filed suit against the National Archives to demand release of the White House schedules and phone records pertaining to Mrs. Clinton. A judge denied the group's request for an immediate injunction but ordered the archives to propose by October 1 a schedule for release of the records.

Since the Clinton Library's records became available for public request last year, only four requests have been completed and released to the public. Three of those consist only of photographs. Ms. Robison said archivists have finished some other requests but they are still in the presidential review process.

In legal papers filed in the Judicial Watch case, Ms. Robison said more than 10 million pages of records are awaiting processing in response to 266 pending requests. It appears that it will take years or perhaps even decades to clear the 10 million-page backlog.

"The Clinton Presidential Library has no more than six archivists available to process all of its pending FOIA requests for textual and electronic records," Ms. Robison wrote.

"As soon as we get any records ready, trust me, we'll put them out on our Web site," she said yesterday. "We're going to be as happy as anyone to get this information available."


Reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

Won't happen before the Nov 08 election. [MORE]

LDC 

Sep 13, 2007 10:42

why won't dick cheney release his records, or GW as well. I am sure theirs aren't squeaky clean.

[MORE]

Pat 

Sep 13, 2007 11:33

If Mrs. Clinton is going to use her time as First Lady as a credential for being president, then should... [MORE]

Ted 

Sep 13, 2007 11:36

Where are all the media outlets clamoring for this release? [MORE]

CJ Wilson 

Sep 13, 2007 13:24

Every day we are not given access to these records is a day that justice (Watch) is denied to US... [MORE]

Lee 

Sep 13, 2007 16:44

Justice has absolutely nothing to do with Judicial Watch. They only care about "justice" when it can be used to... [MORE]

Jason 

Oct 24, 2007 14:11

If Hillary has nothing to hide, then why is there a problem of releasing these files? It seems rather suspicious... [MORE]

Gerri 

Dec 10, 2007 14:50

I sure wont hold my breath waiting for them to be put out. That word "MAY" to me means NO. [MORE]

Clifford Gerald 

Sep 13, 2007 12:13

Whether she releases her records or not, the fact of the matter is that she's just as corrupt as any... [MORE]

Chris Gonzalez 

Sep 13, 2007 12:16

I would really like to see the "redacted" parts of the Barrett Report. I understand that the Democrats have really,... [MORE]

Marianne Wooten 

Sep 13, 2007 13:00

She should have nothing to worry about since we all know she has nothing to hide??!! [MORE]

Alan 

Sep 13, 2007 13:23

Comment on this article

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.

    Fall Education
    A New York Sun Advertorial Section

    NEW YORK ›

    A Surge of Support for the Sun Voiced by Leaders in the City

    19 Columbia Freshmen Jump to the Ivy League From the Armed Forces

    2 Arrested for Running Prostitution Ring

    Community Organizers 'Appalled' by Their Portrayal

    City Teacher Charged With Section 8 Fraud

    More School Construction Is Urged for Manhattan

    NATIONAL ›

    Detroit Mayor To Step Down: 'I Lied Under Oath'

    Hurricane Ike Strengthens to Category 4

    Palin Speech Draws More Than 40 Million Viewers

    Abortion Rights Group Sees 'Discrepancy' in Palin Stance

    Bush To Announce Troop Levels in Iraq Next Week

    Abramoff Sentenced to Four Years in Corruption Scandal

    ARTS+ ›

    This Old House: Godfrey Cheshire's Family History

    Alan Ball Is Looking for Trouble

    Latinbeart 2008: The Heart of Latin America Is Strong

    'Mister Foe': The Boy Who Cried Mother

    'Everybody Wants To Be Italian': Love Is Never Saying ... Anything

    'August Evening': A Repressed Family in the Land of the Free