I think the big problem is that the SA is not helping its tenants, many of whom are elderly, find suitable alternative housing. Maybe it's not their legal responsibility to do so, but it is their moral responsibility.
According to some other articles I've read on this issue, the SA has been intimidating the tenants and they actually videotaped them while giving out the eviction notices. Also (and this might be illegal) the SA waited months before giving the tenants anything in writing. Before then they were just trying to steer everyone out.
Whether or not the assemblymen are doing this for publicity I don't know, but I think it's safe to say that beyond ego, they're doing this because affordable housing is becoming such a serious issue.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
If it's a question of legality, doesn't the organization have an obligation to provide housing for working women of moderate... [MORE]
Chris
Feb 16, 2007 22:26
I think the big problem is that the SA is not helping its tenants, many of whom are elderly, find...
Jeff
Feb 18, 2007 00:00
Hey it is the Salvation Army's buildings. They can do what they want with them as long as the deem... [MORE]
Ted
Feb 16, 2007 13:39
It may be their building, but it was given to them to help low-income working women. As far as I... [MORE]
Andrew
Feb 16, 2007 14:47
Comment on Tenants To Sue the Salvation Army Over Plans To Sell Residences
Would You Like to Become a Sustaining Subscriber of the Sun? Sign up now