I never saw JEW OF MALTA, I admit. But in all my years of theater-going, I have never seen a finer portrayal of Shylock. The humanity of the character was beautifully nuanced, as is Shakespeare's text. You thought him conniving, money-grubbing, clever and at the same time, touching, pitiful, and horribly wronged. I did like Dustin Hoffman's portrayal in London a few years ago--and Pacino does beautifully in the film, despite a butchered text.
But the critic here is missing a masterful job of acting in F. Murray Abraham's work. It was also accomplished without much help from a rather callow college-level supporting cast. That shows a real professional at work--maintaining the tragic and human qualities of the victim and yet his own dignity onstage almost by himself. I thought it was brilliant, and an attempt by a law professor to encapsulate the many layers of prejudice in Shakespeare's play while overlooking the center of the centrifugal force in this production is small-minded and demonstrates that he hasn't seen very many Shylocks. We are lucky to have Abraham in the ranks of classical actors in the U.S. This production demonstrates why.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
I never saw JEW OF MALTA, I admit. But in all my years of theater-going, I have never seen a...