If one believes that there are no significant, inherent differences between peoples and cultures then one might conclude, as Mr. Eastwood apparently has, that the military uniform of one country and the person who wears it is substantially the same as its analogue from another country. Hence, at least at this level, there is no such thing as diversity, only similarity. I think the more interesting question is whether Mr. Eastwood was genuinely unaware of the historical record or simply chose to ignore it. Since this film has already won one award and may well be on the fast track for an Academy Award, would it be inopportune to wonder whether the historical record—had Mr. Eastwood elected to pay some attention to it—might have been an inconvenient truth unlikely to garner for him the approval of those judges who are responsible for handing out these awards?
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
As usual Kozak is on target. History should not be rewritten to fit a Hollywood story.
Thank you. povich [MORE]
povich
Feb 24, 2007 23:28
Warren Kozak!
Finally a Wisconsin alumnus after myown heart.
Your articles are right on the money.
Warren, great articles you... [MORE]
Yoav Spicehandler
Feb 24, 2007 04:44
If one believes that there are no significant, inherent differences between peoples and cultures then one might conclude, as Mr....
R.J. Yankow
Feb 23, 2007 10:02
Mr. Kozak makes some very valid points about the Japanese culpability. I hope those Republican politicians who pander to White... [MORE]
Jerry Skurnik
Feb 23, 2007 09:36
Jerry, better lay off the koolaid. The flag of the south never tried to exterminate anyone. Comparing the south or... [MORE]