Submitted by Nick Andrelli, Mar 6, 2007 10:02

I lost any interest I might have had in Cameron's claim about finding Jesus' tomb when I read that the tomb had actually been discovered around 30 years ago.

But I hadn't heard that there were no remains in that tomb, as Ms. Colon states in the article. Instead of disproving the basic premise of Christianity, as Cameron and others said in the run-up to the documentary, if the tomb was empty, wouldn't that imply that the Resurrection had indeed taken place, and strengthen the Christian's beliefs?

Just a thought.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.