You don't dispute the finding that Mr. Libby lied. - Reader comments at The New York Sun

Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
The Cost of Libby

Submitted by steve finken, Mar 7, 2007 22:14

You don't dispute the finding that Mr. Libbly lied.

Yet you would have found him Not Guilty if you had been on the jury. So your position is that in certain circumstances, it is okay to lie to a grand jury during a criminal investigation.

I honestly don't get it.

OtSo you would

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment	By	Date
You don't dispute the finding that Mr. Libbly lied. Yet you would have found him Not Guilty if you had been...	steve finken	Mar 7, 2007 22:14
I agree that Mr. Libby should be pardoned. President Bush actions (or inactions) by not taking his political enemies head... [MORE]	Brian Fendley	Mar 7, 2007 16:50
Your editorial implies that you would have preferred that the journalists themselves engage in criminal behavior by not appearing as... [MORE]	Tim Bradley	Mar 7, 2007 15:58
since it is apparantly legal to divulge valerie plames employment status i wish someone would explain why this investigation and... [MORE]	john codrey	Mar 7, 2007 12:51
You conclude your editorial by saying, " President Bush's failure to halt the prosecution of Libby has costs to the... [MORE]	Robert Morris	Mar 7, 2007 11:51
You would have allowed a lie. Pat Fitzgerald said that perjury threatens our system of rule of law. To your... [MORE]	kate Mead	Mar 12, 2007 00:28
Ms. Mead, you're preaching to the converted. I agree completely that Mr. Libby should not be pardoned. I respectfully suggest... [MORE]	Robert Morris	Mar 12, 2007 05:41

Reader comment on:The Cost of Libby

Other reader comments on this article

Comment on The Cost of Libby

Reader comment on:
The Cost of Libby