The review is OK. But, it does not put the book in any perspective. What is Richardson's point of view etc.
Also the review does not tell you if this book is any better than the many other books on WJ or not.
[Inaccuracy] Also there is an error...Charles Peirce was not a colleague of WJ's in the Philosophy Dept. or any other Dept. at Harvard. [Benjamin Peirce his father was in the Math Dept. at Harvard at that time and could be a colleague but not his son Charles!.] Charles was a good friend of WJ but he was not a colleague of WJ's at Harvard!
Best/Allan Holtzman/
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
The review is OK. But, it does not put the book in any perspective. What is Richardson's point of view...