Submitted by Ronald Harris, Nov 17, 2006 06:39

Mr. Kunitz, you seem to be a literary man, a well read and well spoken man, but the fact remains, you don't know Harry Moses. Having known him for more that 15 years, I take issue with your besmirching his character in your critical review of his movie. Harry is above reproach when it comes to "nefarious" matters and your ploy of dragging in the question of fingerprint identification authenticity merely clouds the much larger issues that the movie portends, namely the little lady versus the "good old boy network" or the pauper versus the country club set. Fingerprint identification was long ago replaced by the more reliable DNA testing, yet your review says nothing of having the painting tested for Pollock's DNA. With all due respect sir, take another, longer look at the real issues addressed in this film. Thank you.

Ronald Harris

P.O. Box 22299

San Diego, California 92192

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.