Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Albany Eyes a New Tax — on Pets

Submitted by Caryn, Apr 22, 2007 19:02

I have animals and I feel a kinship with all other people who love animals and take on the responsible of caring for them. Even though it is our choice and we get great pleasure from having them, I do not feel that we should pay taxes to have them. WE ARE HELPING SOCIETY by adopting homeless animals. All my animals were either abandoned on the streets or I adopted at the pound. I know plenty of people like me who take on this responsibility and cost -- and it is a cost. As it is, many people cannot afford to give their pets proper health care or proper nutrition --- but they love their animals and do the best they can for them. If anything, we should be helping these people -- not burdening them with an extra tax! This sounds like a backfire plan to me -- as now many of those same people who would think about saving an animal from a shelter may think twice. Not to mention that now people on a budget will think twice about buying that food or treat for their beloved animal. And, by the way, people who have animals are more than likely the people who give to nonprofit animals organizations already. I do. I think it is wrong to put this extra burden on people who are already helping animals. There has to be a better alternative.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

i say no, i have two dogs and seven cats and things have just gotten way to expensive in the... [MORE]

jess 

Mar 20, 2008 11:12

On the surface this may not sound so bad. It may help curb the number of people with more animals... [MORE]

Reptasia 

May 14, 2007 23:35

NAIS, surcharges on dog licenses, now another proposed expense for pet owners? NYS residents are the highest taxed in the... [MORE]

BDC 

May 4, 2007 16:45

I have animals and I feel a kinship with all other people who love animals and take on the responsible...

Caryn 

Apr 22, 2007 19:02

It would make a LOT more sense for the money to go toward SPAY-NEUTER of animals which would PREVENT the... [MORE]

Tammi 

Apr 22, 2007 10:59

Nobody likes taxes, but nobody likes animals dying. But if pet owners are essentially responsible for animals in shelters, why let... [MORE]

Kevin Degidon 

Apr 21, 2007 13:54

This is unexceptable! I'm absolutely furious. NYS receives probably tens of millions of dollars on sales tax revenue from the... [MORE]

Margie Oliveira 

Jun 1, 2007 12:32

Let the tax pass. Shelters and rehabilitators would fare much better by this "self-regulation" than they do now getting nickels... [MORE]

It's about time! 

Apr 20, 2007 13:54

If the money goes to saving condemned animals OK, but some how I suspect that it won't... [MORE]

Alan 

Apr 20, 2007 10:38

The title is misleading. The tax is on supplies, not on pets. We're trying to do this in Michigan and... [MORE]

Dee Gage 

Apr 20, 2007 10:24

Say good bye to your Senate Seat. There is as much chance of the proceeds from this tax going for... [MORE]

Jack 

Apr 20, 2007 09:56

Does anybody actually think that this tax will go to shelters? Maybe in the first year, but you can be... [MORE]

TB 

Apr 22, 2007 15:48

Comment on Albany Eyes a New Tax — on Pets

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.