Submitted by RPH, Apr 27, 2007 08:19

I believe given more time the responses would have been clearer from all lead front runners. However, given the situation, one has to conclude that one as president would have to make a quick response in that situation. Obama and especially after he followed up on his response was the more thought out one - look at his personal vote on the war , Hillary followed after Edwards replied the same - to react swiftly, which in no doubt all would do but then right at the end she replied and I would destroy them! My over all thought is it's important to be aggressive if our country was attacked, but needs to be assertive not reactive as Hillary implied, that frightens me, but then unfortunately, this just underlines my gut feeling about her as well as my thoughts.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.