CONTACT US

Reader comment on:
Clinton: Democrats Don't Want Blame for Iraq War Shortages
in response to reader comment: Yes and No

Submitted by Nate, Apr 28, 2007 18:13

Andrew-

A couple of things come to mind from reading your comment.

I'm not exactly sure what you were responding to in your insightful little piece: I never once said that I supported the troop withdrawal--hell, I never even said I supported the Democrats. I said that partisan bickering was a useless waste of time, and it does nothing but set our country back. Further, I implied that Giuliani is a hack, employing base strategies to get a rise out of his opposition and wiggle his way higher on the front page of the newspaper.

I'm not quite sure what you meant by "you're criticizing the very thing you're saying" (spelling errors removed)... I was criticizing politicians saying whatever we want to hear--and Giuliani was saying what most of the conservative base wants to hear: that Democrats are soft on defense. Giuliani did not say "we need a strong leader"--which we do--he said "we need a Republican because Democrats can't fight." Which is partisan hackery.

In truth, I think the withdrawal deadline is a stupid idea, and one that will only make life harder on the troops, and for that I think the Democrats are just as bad as Giuliani is: they're playing politics, nothing more. However, the fact of the matter is that a Republican got us into this mess. There is a real disgusting trend going on in this country where somehow being thoughtful and careful and being strong on defense are seen as mutually exclusive. We cannot win in Iraq; we're in the middle of a civil war in which we are outnumbered, and both sides want us dead. Iraq has become a haven to terrorists thanks to the Republicans, and our military is now stretched so thin that if a dictator who actually DOES have weapons of mass destruction feels the need to come at us--we don't have the manpower to defend ourselves by conventional means.

The point of my whole comment, if you'd been so kind as to finish the third grade before reading it, was that our leaders are playing politics with the lives of our troops, the lives of the citizens of this country, and the lives of every person on this planet. I'm not sure how that translated into my not being grateful for who we are or what we offer the world. Though, really, thanks so much for trying.

And before I forget, just for the sake of clarification: our president is the son of a Connecticut oil magnate, not a Colorado brewmaster; maybe before you go around telling people to leave the big decisions up to those of you who "know reality," you may want to make sure you can type a complete sentence without sounding like a moron, or at least learn how to spell the name of the leader of the war you are so attached to. Furthermore, Andrew, if you are so convinced that this "real" war on terror is neccesary (again, nimrod--Congress never declared war. It is a military action at best, and a borderline treasonous occupation at worst. Read your constitution, little Andrew); If you are so convinced that this is the path we need to follow, then you'd better be writing these little comments from a notebook on the back of a Humvee somewhere with a flak jacket on your back, bub, or you're just as hypocritical as the morons you want to vote for.

Thanks for your time and consideration.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

I too hope Agore jumps into the fray. This crop of Democrats has become predictably tedius and we need to... [MORE]

Kyda Sylvester 

Apr 26, 2007 23:09

It happened on Bush's watch. Period. [MORE]

Lee 

Apr 26, 2007 18:38

Democrats are Defeatocrats. Plain and simple. [MORE]

Nathan 

Apr 26, 2007 14:26

Is Mr. Giuliani the best this country has to offer for a presidential candidate? He is using the same arguments... [MORE]

Louis Rossi 

Apr 26, 2007 10:08

How do we ever expect to "win" a war against a nebulous, nearly impossible-to-track enemy when we can't stop bickering... [MORE]

Nate 

Apr 26, 2007 09:34

I followed your train of thought all the way till the end.You are right in that no one seems to... [MORE]

Andrew 

Apr 27, 2007 11:51

Andrew- A couple of things come to mind from reading your comment. I'm not exactly sure what you were responding to in...

Nate 

Apr 28, 2007 18:13

Mr Giuliani is right and its too bad that the democrats are so blind in wanting to get power they... [MORE]

Charles 

Apr 26, 2007 09:21

Comment on Clinton: Democrats Don't Want Blame for Iraq War Shortages

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.

    NEW YORK ›

    September 11 Health Bill Stalls; One Backer Blames City Hall

    Low-Price Laptops Tested at City Schools

    New Policy Is Sought in Albany After Report on Silver's Travel

    Bed Bug Boom Is a Boost To One Sector

    Solons Busy Outside Office, New Income Report Shows

    Atlantic Yard Project Suffers a Setback

    NATIONAL ›

    Feingold Bill Would Limit Searches of Travelers' Laptops

    Palin, McCain Decry 'Gotcha' Journalism

    Gates Calls for a Balanced Military

    Dispute Over Witness Disrupts Stevens Trial

    Heart Patients Need Screening For Depression

    Little Progress Made in Effort To Restore Everglades

    ARTS+ ›

    New York Film Festival Goes Around the World and Back

    A British Artist Plumbs the Politics of Hunger

    Barbet Schroeder Can't Be Killed

    'Choke': Hard To Swallow

    'Eagle Eye': Let It Go to Voicemail

    'The Lucky Ones': Nothing Salves the Soul Like a Road Trip