they only had muskets in 1776 - Reader comments at The New York Sun

Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
A Glimpse of Evil
in response to reader comment: Concealed Carry is the answer!

Submitted by dan mckeown, Apr 30, 2007 05:30

The constitution allows everyone the authority to own a weapon. When it was written its constructors had no way of knowing that technology would create far more powerful and destructive guns. They used muskets during the revolution and every gun owner knows that a musket is barely as deadly as a bow and arrow. During the civil war and world war 11 great advances in weapons technology followed by greater losses of life. This trend continues today and our lawmakers have a duty to enact legislation to prevent these weapons from being bought on internet or at vendors. Those who advocate fighting terrorism should realize that "terrorists" always prosper in societys with loose gun control such as those in Africa and the middle east where guns are not under great restriction. The hypothesis that we need to own weapons for pretection is countered by insurance rates, which go up if a family owns a gun. It has been demonstrated time and time again that a gunowner is 100 to 1000 times more likely to accidently or in a fit of rage, kill another family member, then a burgler. But perhaps some guns can still be allowed, for all the itchy trigger fingers out there. Just not the Semi-automatic guns that killed some of the brightest minds of our nation.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment	By	Date
The Virginia Tech shootings provoke cries for draconian gun control laws enlisting wisdom from bureaucrats and politicians comparable to those... [MORE]	Nolan Nelson	Apr 21, 2007 21:22
You all are missing the point here. This is what happens when you try to limit who can own a... [MORE]	Jack Modena	Apr 29, 2007 18:01
Every time an atrocity of this nature occurs, somehow we as a nation seem to forget the loss of X... [MORE]	A Troubled American	Apr 18, 2007 18:07
We will never get rid of guns in this country. And I say that being an anti-gun person. I have... [MORE]	Garrett	Apr 18, 2007 13:51
To Ciancaglini,Garrett,Saterlee. You are living in a dream world if you thing any kind of a law would have stopped... [MORE]	Rogers Marshall	Apr 18, 2007 18:23
There is no sanity in the 'Insanity of Gun Obsession' response. The point this person misses, and most people who... [MORE]	CR Mountjoy	Apr 17, 2007 17:46
Some of what I am reading about Cho today suggest he was crazy not evil. There is a difference. Unfortunately, from... [MORE]	obera	Apr 17, 2007 14:49
I find the editorial's labeling of the culprit as "evil" rather unhelpful. Certainly his acts could be labelled as evil.... [MORE]	Guy B. Jones	Apr 17, 2007 14:20
Hey, 9-11 was the biggest mass slaughter in our history...No guns were involved. [MORE]	Edmond J. Gruenenfelder	Apr 19, 2007 12:26
Although it is nearly universally accepted that there are individuals who are mentally burdened, the murdered remain murdered, and the... [MORE]	George Rivera	Apr 23, 2007 20:18
As a pediatric physician, I can tell you universal allowance of handgun possession is not the answer to the escalating... [MORE]	Doreen Ciancaglini	Apr 17, 2007 14:13
Nearly twenty years ago a woman friend of mine, staunchly anti-gun, was sitting in her boyfriend's convertible waiting for him... [MORE]	A.L.	Apr 17, 2007 13:50
If it had been a tornado in VA, they would have found a way to warn the students. It had been... [MORE]	Jay Larson	Apr 17, 2007 11:59
The constitution allows everyone the authority to own a weapon. When it was written its constructors had no way of...	dan mckeown	Apr 30, 2007 05:30
Naturally, what we--the country with the most guns,the most murders by guns, the most weapons manufacturers and weapon sellers in... [MORE]	Don Satterlee	Apr 17, 2007 11:25
Allow me to correct Don Saterlee. Virginia Tech type incidents do not occur daily in Iraq. What does occur... [MORE]	David Eisenberg	Apr 18, 2007 12:09
>>The Second Amendment was never intended to arm violently disposed people with modern mass killing machines. Well, that is correct. The... [MORE]	Dave Blackmon	Apr 20, 2007 15:13

Reader comment on:A Glimpse of Evilin response to reader comment: Concealed Carry is the answer!

Other reader comments on this article

Comment on A Glimpse of Evil

Reader comment on:
A Glimpse of Evil
in response to reader comment: Concealed Carry is the answer!