Why do none of the major paper critics ever mention Paul West 's brilliant "The Immensity of the Here and Now" when discussing "9/11 novels"? His is by far the most profound of the so-called "post-9/11 novels" by a serious literary figure (I don't deem thrillers and other pulp-fiction novels to have dealt with the subject to be worthy of mention or regard). Instead the critics all trot out either the same tired old warhorses - Updike, Pynchon, McEwan, Roth, and now DeLillo (though his claim to serious critical regard is, I think vastly overrated) - or precious and shallow wunderkinds like Foer. It's a measure not only of how low literary criticism has sunk, in that most of these same critics probably don't even know the West book, but also a measure of how literary groupthink leads critics to continue to reference the same people over and over as our supposedly "greates living writers" and deem such authors worthy of serious attention even though they regulrly churn out books that fall well short of those of their prime (witness the recent spate of excess media attention given to the decrepit and utterly banal Norman Mailer's most recent drivel).
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
I think the idea that writers like Delillo perform a public service by interpreting events like 9/11 is risable. The... [MORE]
stuart munro
May 13, 2007 02:12
"Falling Man" extends the brilliant career of America's foremost novelist. He is the only American white male to have any... [MORE]
kl
May 28, 2007 17:56
Jonathan Safran Foer (Everything is Illuminated) has also written a post 9/11 book that is very good. I will get... [MORE]
Leslie
May 12, 2007 22:20
Why do none of the major paper critics ever mention Paul West 's brilliant "The Immensity of the Here and...
Dennis
May 4, 2007 21:02
Dennis's right-on comments about Paul West's The Immensity of the Here and Now, a novel of 9.11raise two points: 1)... [MORE]
Ronald Christ
May 5, 2007 13:33
I moved my family from New Zealand to the US less that 3 weeks before September 11, 2001. I am... [MORE]
Bruce Sheridan
May 4, 2007 13:51
Delillo has always seemed like someone staring very hard at something I can't see. [MORE]
Mick Sherman
May 4, 2007 12:47
DeLillo's two best passages (ok, very subjectively, since I've only read four of his books) are 1. the baseball scene... [MORE]
Bill
May 4, 2007 10:16
The South suffered badly in the Civil War, and its fiction reflects that. I think you will begin to see... [MORE]
BH
May 4, 2007 12:42
With all due respect to Adam Kirsch, he needs to leave the library and inhale some fresh air. Spetember 11... [MORE]
Michael Anderson
May 4, 2007 09:36
I may be slow but I don't exactly get this piece. Kirsch is ordinarily a very fine writer. But the... [MORE]
Shalom Freedman
May 4, 2007 08:47
In response to trey. I'm unaware why disagreement with the country you live in necessarily means that one must move... [MORE]
middle
May 4, 2007 08:41
Carl Schurz put this more eloquently than I ever could over a century ago. The quote has been misused since... [MORE]
Ef
May 4, 2007 11:22
Have we heard, read, and seen in film (The Pawnbroker) scenarios of survivor culture shock and survivor guilt? -- at... [MORE]
Frank Joseph Routman
May 3, 2007 10:07
was attacked for once. the question that was never dealt with was "why do they hate us"... and the answer... [MORE]
michael roloff
May 2, 2007 10:02
america is certainly not innocent, of this we can agree. but it is the still the best country to live... [MORE]
trey
May 2, 2007 23:58
America is certainly the best country to live in? Only an American could say that without feeling any need to... [MORE]