I was at the performance of Mahler's second, and I thought Eschenbach's reading of it was atrocious. Mr. Nordlinger mentions briefly how there were strange pauses and rests in the music, somewhat breaking the Mahlerian flow, but I think that its more accurate that Eschenbach's bizarre phrasing decisions stripped, as much as was possible, the emotional power of the Symphony. Mr. Eschenbach completely destroyed the incredible, two minute climax about a third of the way into the first movement with his strange tempo changes, and extreme rubato at the end of the climax. Occasionally, Mahler managed to shine through, despite the conducting, but at other times, I was genuinely bored, which is not supposed to happen during any concert, and certainly not when the composer is Mahler. The Philadelphia Orchestra is, of course, a wonderful orchestra, and it is a pity they are led by someone who takes away so much from the original music.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
I was at the performance of Mahler's second, and I thought Eschenbach's reading of it was atrocious. Mr. Nordlinger mentions...
Ben Meltzer
May 10, 2007 05:36
I was at the performance of Mahler's second and I thought Eschenbach's reading of it was marvelous. Not only was... [MORE]
William Hon
Sep 20, 2007 14:26
I do not understand what William Hon thinks he heard on that fateful day in May 2007, but Eschenbach most... [MORE]
Ben Meltzer
Sep 30, 2007 23:31
Comment on Eschenbach Brings Emotion to the Fore
Would You Like to Become a Sustaining Subscriber of the Sun? Sign up now