America is involved in the Middle East as the result of the long ago actions of two Democrat Presidents. When President Franklin Roosevelt was returning from the 1943 grand summit's political discussions in Tehran with Stalin, he met on board a United States Cruiser in the Red Sea with Saudi Arabia's ibn Saud, whom he promised American protection in exchange for petroleum concessions. When Israel declared its inception as a sovereign state in May, 1948 , President Truman, against the stated wishes of Secretary of State Marshall, gave the new state de facto recognition, while Stalin concurrently recognized Israel de jure. Were the Presidential actions in the interests of the United States? Probably not, as today's Congressionally distorted hindsight shows us. Were they ethical? Most certainly. Those two actions by Democrat Presidents were the sticky strand that drew the United States into the entangling web of the rancid politics of that Region. America tried to walk away once after Saddam had been evicted from Kuwait by an American Armed Force designed to stave off the Red Army in Europe. As a result, the Iraqi peoples spent a long impoverished decade suffering the sanctions directed at Saddam, which had the effect of further destabilizing the Region. The present Gulf War (a mulligan campaign) must correct that failure to execute the strategic imperative. Else, the Region will come to resemble Germany during the Thirty Years War, and instead of petroleum, their corrosive politics will be the primary export. Indeed, today's senseless bickering in the United States Congress is only a mild taste of what we will experience if the United States Army fails to pacify the Region.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Heart-wrenching because it is exactly the spot President Bush has been put into. [MORE]
helen benedict
May 11, 2007 16:46
History can help us make good decisions about our future and will help us have courage to fight the battle... [MORE]
roy crosby
May 11, 2007 15:00
Will people never look back at history? Bush is very courageous in the face of the nation's newspapers. Thank God... [MORE]
LEO KHANDJIAN
May 11, 2007 10:32
God bless president Lincoln and president Bush. May our current efforts be crowned with success. May the Iraqi people achieve... [MORE]
Doug Santo
May 11, 2007 10:16
I am disappointed and ashamed to admit that my representative from southeast Missouri is among those so-called "Republicans" who have... [MORE]
M. J. Slayton
May 11, 2007 09:48
requires a leap of imagination I doubt anyone posesses. [MORE]
gregdn
May 11, 2007 09:45
I find this article to be a good analogy of what is going on today. The press wields great power... [MORE]
Kim Baldinger
May 11, 2007 09:44
America is involved in the Middle East as the result of the long ago actions of two Democrat Presidents. When...
Claude Bogardus
May 11, 2007 09:21
I sure wish President Bush and other Bush suppoters would get this point across to those that think leaving Iraq... [MORE]
James Robbins
May 11, 2007 09:18
I understand the direction of this article, however, I also understand we live in a far different world than that... [MORE]
RJ
May 11, 2007 08:50
Author(s) are to be commended for their knowledge of history and its direct applicability to the lily-livered, weak-kneed, traitorous Congresscritters... [MORE]
Kevin Coughlin
May 11, 2007 08:41
We are there and we have to finish the job..there is an old expression.."When the going gets tough, the tough... [MORE]
Robert Royce
May 14, 2007 14:23
If the (some) republicans think that president Bush has lost support from the majority of the voting republicans and force... [MORE]
Armando Lopez
May 11, 2007 08:08
What a great story out of history. I have read a great deal about the Civil War and never came... [MORE]
joseph Kane
May 11, 2007 02:38
Comment on ‘I Didn't Have an Answer'
Would You Like to Become a Sustaining Subscriber of the Sun? Sign up now