Why Do They Do It? Why do people who are not actually conversant in the Floyd Landis case insist upon using mangled, misrepresented, or downright false information to illustrate some greater point about society or tell a lame joke? Don't they know there are those of us out here who actually follow the case, and can point out all of their inaccuracies? Mr. Klein, here's something else that's pathetic - the press and general public shamelessly expounding on Floyd, when they haven't bothered to get the facts straight. Watch the 2006 Tour, then watch all nine days of hearings, and then maybe you'll know what you're talking about.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
A wonderful article! One might wish that Mr. Klein will pusue the reasons for obvious plagiarism and the ramifications of... [MORE]
jenette leblang
Jun 13, 2007 07:52
It's interesting how hard it seems to be to evaluate the facts in Landis's case dispassionately. Suppose I were a... [MORE]
Alexander Klein
Jun 10, 2007 17:37
I really don't understand the position that you have taken by the statement "they continue to take the Landis gamble... [MORE]
Jack Magyar
Jun 9, 2007 08:13
The seeming ineffectiveness of teaching about plagiarism reminds me of the shown ineffectiveness about teaching young university researchers about inappropriate... [MORE]
Coauthorship expert
Jun 9, 2007 06:17
The Floyd Landis hearings produced a total demolition of every claim USADA and the French testing lab made against Landis.... [MORE]
John Garrett
Jun 8, 2007 21:09
Why Do They Do It? Why do people who are not actually conversant in the Floyd Landis case insist upon...
Julie
Jun 8, 2007 12:47
It is fine that Mr. Klein's detector can compare text from the Web to text in student papers. It is... [MORE]