Perhaps this appears in print somewhere, but I am reading it online, and can comment on it. It's a blog.
So, since you are using a form that is 'not well suited to write about literature" to write about literature -- do you think what you wrote would somehow read better in a newspaper than it does online?
Personally, I don't think there would be much difference whether I read your words in newsprint or here online.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
As is with all high minded writers......... published writers that is........officially published in a book or newspaper writers that is.............. [MORE]
cheyanne
Aug 10, 2007 16:47
Kirsch has his own blog set up within six months. He's right about some things, and wrong about a lot.... [MORE]
Levari
Jul 5, 2007 16:42
As print & online media continue to merge & mutate, it becomes increasingly difficult to make value judgements grounded on... [MORE]
Henry Gould
Jun 29, 2007 08:31
Re: ethics. There are none insofar as the publishing world goes. Reviews are de facto blurb factories.
And people will read... [MORE]
Dan Schneider
Jun 27, 2007 08:23
Over the last two years, I have read and enjoyed many blogs but all of them on and off, the... [MORE]
Anirudh Karnick
Jun 27, 2007 08:00
What about the shills at Amazon booksellers? What category do they inhabit? There is number one reviewer, Harriet Klausner, whose... [MORE]
Barbara Delaney
Jun 19, 2007 20:34
Al the squabbling between bloggers and journalists - or in this case critics - obscures the real issue, which is... [MORE]
Ms Baroque
Jun 16, 2007 19:32
Perhaps I am just quibbling, but I find a number of reviews in the London Review of Books tedious, overly... [MORE]
Anirudh Karnick
Jun 27, 2007 08:11
A spirited debate has been raging over the bookblog, a medium soundly denounced by many literary critics, who condemn bookblogs... [MORE]
Bibliolatrist
Jun 16, 2007 14:07
Although I have to agree that the analysis, especially the part about the length and language of blogs, can be... [MORE]
Marc André Bélanger
Jun 15, 2007 12:41
I do not know what blogs Mr. Kirsch has been reading, but if he were to look around a little... [MORE]
Robert Archambeau
Jun 14, 2007 17:07
Kirsch states that bloggers are upset with criticism of their blogs, while the articles that have appeared recently have been... [MORE]
harvey
Jun 14, 2007 14:24
It's interesting that many any of the commentators who complain that Mr. Kirsch generalizes also generalize by not providing links... [MORE]
Bill
Jun 14, 2007 13:13
I really don't accept your thesis that blogging provides bite-sized reviewing; if anything blog reviews have lengthier reviews than what... [MORE]
Robert Nagle
Jun 14, 2007 12:23
Unfortunately the newspaper book reviewers have to come to terms with the fact that print journallism is struggling to stay... [MORE]
Gerry Young
Jun 14, 2007 10:52
I don't think we should confuse "reviews" with "literary criticism". Reviews run from the small town weekly up to the... [MORE]
rpm
Jun 14, 2007 10:19
"Those who can, do, and those who can't, blog?" Cute as hell, but also stupid as hell. Plenty of "real"... [MORE]
Kelley Dupuis
Jun 14, 2007 08:38
As a British reviewer, writer & blogger I enjoyed this article very much. I agree with a lot that you... [MORE]
PD Smith
Jun 14, 2007 07:14
Although I agree that there could be more book reviews available (especially as an LA Times reader disgusted by the... [MORE]
Katya Johann
Jun 14, 2007 02:28
Yet another 'the internet is bad for books' rant (print = good, internet = bad) without evidence or an understanding... [MORE]
Duncan
Jun 14, 2007 00:19
Among the many oversights in this piece, Mr.Kirsch, let me point out three:
"Often isolated and inexperienced, usually longing to break... [MORE]
Chandrahas Choudhury
Jun 14, 2007 00:14
Literally, a person can post whatever they want to on a blog. Someone who blogs in not infected with a... [MORE]
Justin Dobbs
Jun 13, 2007 21:25
In fact, despite what the bloggers themselves believe, the future of literary culture does not lie with blogs — or... [MORE]
Tammy Everts
Jun 13, 2007 19:20
Dear Mr. Kirsch,
While I agree with many of the points that you make in your article on literary blogs, and... [MORE]
Reginald Shepherd
Jun 13, 2007 19:11
"The blog form, that miscellany of observations, opinions, and links, is not well-suited to writing about literature..."
Adam Kirsch's spurious rhetorical... [MORE]
Steven Augustine
Jun 13, 2007 15:11
Don't get around much, do you, Kirsch? I won't trouble you with links to the many worthwhile blogs devoted to... [MORE]
Mark J. McPherson
Jun 13, 2007 15:10
Oddly enough, I found the link to this article on a literary blog. While I agree that perhaps literary blogging... [MORE]
Jessica
Jun 13, 2007 14:28
Dear CR Beha,
So, using the "I know it when I see it" approach to what constitutes a blog and what... [MORE]
Jonny Diamond
Jun 13, 2007 14:10
I've heard these arguments before.
So, only print reviewers are capable of an intellectual discourse on literature? If bloggers are so... [MORE]
Wendy
Jun 13, 2007 12:57
Iam leading publisher from India. My experience is very very bad , most leading newspaper of India stoped to review... [MORE]
Ramesh Raghuvanshi
Jun 13, 2007 11:37
Good literary criticism is a highly complex form of civilized discourse, and is generally not to be found in blogs.... [MORE]
Tom
Jun 13, 2007 11:15
As is oversimplification, particularly in the assumption that 'bloggers' and your rarefied 'professional writers' are in any way separate camps.... [MORE]
Matt
Jun 13, 2007 10:17
If the "literary" bloggers represent a dead end, the fact that their blogs are filled with the stones of ridicule,... [MORE]
Tim Barrus
Jun 13, 2007 10:01
Literary criticism is only worth having if it at least strives to be literary in its own right, with a... [MORE]
Pamela
Jun 13, 2007 09:22
Bloggers are essentially tastemakers, not reviewers. Bloggers' book commentary can be capsulized as, "I like this, I don't like that,... [MORE]
Richard S. Wheeler
Jun 13, 2007 08:54
Precisely because "literature is not news the way politics is news" (though I think a lot of people would consider... [MORE]
Rohan Maitzen
Jun 13, 2007 08:50
Mr Kirsch is a thoughful, useful and reliable commentator on books but alas his media overview is less than that.... [MORE]
Robert Birnbaum
Jun 13, 2007 08:34
As some of the very best reviews are available online or in print where is the dichotomy? [MORE]
G. Roberts
Jun 13, 2007 08:24
Adam Kirsch mixes up two (or more) separate issues. Given that bloggers can in no way be blamed for the... [MORE]
R Campbell
Jun 13, 2007 07:33
One obviously can say more in five thousand words than one can in fifty.
However one can also create a work... [MORE]
Shalom Freedman
Jun 13, 2007 05:13
Shalom Freedman is himself a case in point! I have read many of Shalom Freedman's reviews on Amazon.com over the... [MORE]
Randy Deutsch
Jun 13, 2007 23:41
That this is a blog...right?
Perhaps this appears in print somewhere, but I am reading it online, and can comment on...
John
Jun 13, 2007 02:04
Adam Kirsch denies that literature is like news. However:
"Literature is news that stays news."
Ezra Pound, "ABC of Reading" [1934] chapter... [MORE]
Jonathan Vos Post
Jun 13, 2007 12:09
An article that is published online and made available for comments does not a blog make. The distinction isn't just... [MORE]
CR Beha
Jun 13, 2007 12:12
However, Kirsch is casting aspersion on all blogs when, as you say, he is referring to a handful of them.... [MORE]
John
Jun 13, 2007 13:45
It doesn't greatly matter anymore. Current-day Americans will not read good books in any case, and so it scarcely... [MORE]