Submitted by Michael, Jun 20, 2007 21:16

I think that blockading fuel into Iran is as likely to ignite a violent reaction as dropping bombs is. Without it, their already weak economy will certainly suffer. I am not against such action. Clearly if some sort of action is not taken, the threat is not going to just disappear. I think that the only way it could work effectively is if the blockade comes with a promise (and follow through) of much more significant action if they attack us in retaliation.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.