Too bad the review did not mention contemporary challenges to the dating of the Earth, such as put forth by Creationists and Christian fundamentalists. For example, I have friends who are convinced that the Earth was created approx. 6,000 years ago. One of these friends was trained as a science teacher, and has a master's degree. Of course, as he pursues his fundamentalist religious beliefs he has thrown most today's science overboard.
It almost seems we are going backward. Many religionists today repudiate the fact-based science explored in this book, relying on literal interpretations of the Bible. I would like to imagine that science is slowly persuading the masses to accept its evidence-based conclusions, but I suspect the pendulum is actually swinging the other way.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
First off: to Adam Kirsch, bravo for a thoughtful and badly needed review and editorial article.
The last paragraph is particularly... [MORE]
David Edwards
Jul 4, 2007 14:32
Mankind has searched for the truth since the dawn of history. He has sought it within himself and in the... [MORE]
John O Mahony
Jul 4, 2007 06:06
Man's steady accumulation of information about the world will lead him to one of two possible roads.....1), a wide... [MORE]
Ralph Gaily
Jun 21, 2007 15:33
Religion and myth are not the only paradigmatic way of viewing or interpreting reality. Modern science, wildly successful as it... [MORE]
Harold Kildow
Jul 4, 2007 11:36
The probability is that we will find one best "explanation of who we are and where we come from" (we... [MORE]
Hugh Young
Jul 5, 2007 01:20
or, 3) a narrow road that is full of discovery and enlightenment, which leads us to the conclusion that we... [MORE]
Pukako
Jul 5, 2007 01:30
Too bad the review did not mention contemporary challenges to the dating of the Earth, such as put forth by...