Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
The Dangers of the Fairness Doctrine

Submitted by Ian Gallagher, Jul 27, 2007 19:55

Unlike newspapers and movies and blogs and cable channels, the federal government gives commercial broadcasters a free license to use public property-the airwaves. There are still more people who want these licenses than the government is able to satisfy. In exchange for this very valuable and scarce license, and federal protection against "pirate" (unlicensed) radio operators, broadcasters are supposed to operate in the public interest.

Commercial broadcasters want to be trustees of public property but without responsibility.

The broadcasters like the free license and the free protection, but they just don't want the public involved in telling them whether they are actually serving the public interest..


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

Unlike newspapers and movies and blogs and cable channels, the federal government gives commercial broadcasters a free license to use...

Ian Gallagher 

Jul 27, 2007 19:55

it seems to me that the American, TV viewing, public can differentiate between entertainment and politics. Law & Order starring... [MORE]

Walter L. Wise 

Jul 23, 2007 16:49

I see an important role for talk radio. It airs conservative views, but I find most mainstream news programs equally biased... [MORE]

Naomi Steinberger 

Jul 23, 2007 07:21

Comment on The Dangers of the Fairness Doctrine

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.