Submitted by joe seton, Aug 1, 2007 10:10

I cannot believe that so much is being made of Mrs. Clinton's low cut dress. I'm so cynical when it comes to the Clintons that I think, in fact, it was a deliberate, yet subtle response to Mrs. Edwards' comments implying that Hillary is a man.I know both events occured on July 18, I'm not sure of the order, however, so my theory is not fullproof.I think the Clinton people got nervous at this reference to her sexuality and I'm surprised no one in all this chatter hasn't picked up on it.I think her team is trying to straddle the fence again, she's feminine, championing womens issues and yet she's strong, can wear pant suits, and can be the Commander in Chief. When I initially thought that Hillary was behind Imus getting canned my family thought I was paranoid. No, Hillary had the most to gain from getting him silenced and I'm sure she leaned on all her network, business friends to get him out of the Clinton bashing business during the campaign. I hope Al Sharpton doesn't think he has that much influence.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.