Recent Blog Posts
How Mike Daisey Can Do More With Your Money
The Bullfight
Head to Head with the White House: New York's Stately Dinner for The New York City Ballet
Submitted by Vladimir Zelevinsky, Aug 28, 2007 22:47
It is impossible to agree with many statements by Mr. Rigden.
"Contemporary physicists pay no attention to it" (Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics) -
this is absolutely wrong. It is developed further but the essence stays as a cornerstone.
Bohr did nothing after 1921 - he just founded modern nuclear physics (liquid drop, fission and idea
of compound nucleus). He created great ideas, and naturally, not all of them turned out to be correct, so what?
I am surprised by the tone of this opinion.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
A question and answer on page 127 of Segrč's Faust in Copenhagen provide an opportunity to reveal an "atomic shell... [MORE]
Richard D. Harcourt
Nov 6, 2007 23:20
It is impossible to agree with many statements by Mr. Rigden. "Contemporary physicists pay no attention to it" (Copenhagen interpretation of...
Vladimir Zelevinsky
Aug 28, 2007 22:47
Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.
© 2002-2009 TWO SL LLC, New York, NY. All rights reserved. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.