War-time ally - Reader comments at The New York Sun

Reader comment on:
Clash Of Evils

Submitted by We were fortunate, Sep 10, 2007 09:39

Keep in mind, as even Churchill noted after the war, that the USSR did the bulk of the fighting against Hitler's Germany and its allies. Our alliance with the USSR was an alliance of convenience, not an alliance of conviction. That makes all the difference in the world. Stalin's USSR was a horrific and capricious place, with untold innocent millions dying in the holocaust of the gulag, despite the denials of some who either minimize the numbers or makes excuses for their extermination. Still, without the brutal discipline of the USSR in the way it fought the war, the war could have been lost. In conclusion, we were very fortunate to have had the USSR on our side against Hitler and we were very fortunate to have it, with its inability to deal with the free flow of information and the computer age, as our foe in the Cold War.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment	By	Date
This was formally before the start of WWII but part of the same story. Poles tend to forget to mention... [MORE]	vic	Sep 15, 2007 06:41
Poland did not invade Czechoslovakia. When Hitler invaded Czecholovakia Poland took back the small area of Teschen Czechoslovakia grabbed from... [MORE]	Stef	Oct 6, 2007 19:52
Vic fails to mention that Czechoslovakia invaded Poland in 1919 with 15,000 troops, some in non Czech uniforms. After Austro-Hungary... [MORE]	Stef	Oct 12, 2007 11:20
I borrow that heading from Stephen Jay Gould's gloss on the rise of mammals through the contingent annihilation of dinosaurs... [MORE]	Brian Johnson	Sep 12, 2007 08:01
I read his history of Europe, and there too he takes swipes at Zionism even though it had no connection... [MORE]	Read his books	Sep 12, 2007 01:18
Emotions are easily manipulated and one would be naïve to think that such an emotionally charged issue as the Holocaust... [MORE]	Stef	Oct 6, 2007 23:35
Many people, including American military and political leaders at the time, focus most of their attention on the European war... [MORE]	Blain	Sep 12, 2007 00:19
1. Historian Norman Davies excludes origins, viz. "who started it," i.e. excludes from the explanation of later events the 1939... [MORE]	Don Phillipson	Sep 11, 2007 18:22
The involvement of the US and Great Britian against Germany was necessary for victory. If Great Britian had surrendered, all... [MORE]	charles	Sep 11, 2007 11:59
From the time my childhood in the USA, I've noticed a tendency to focus on Nazi war crimes to the... [MORE]	Aram	Sep 11, 2007 04:32
John's suggestion there was "no need to continue lend lease after 1944" is quaint. Unless the Soviet Union continued to... [MORE]	Norman Hanscombe	Sep 10, 2007 23:20
Hindsight is not always 20-20. The British and Americansconducted a very costly bombing campaign on German cities,costly both in men... [MORE]	Muggins	Sep 10, 2007 23:07
In "No Simple War," his treatment of the Holocaust is generally straightforward and unobjectionable. Yet he evidently still feels bruised... [MORE]	Omri Schwarz	Sep 10, 2007 22:10
He's a product of his times. Maybe he is an anti-Semite. or maybe he feels stung by the Zionist need... [MORE]	ds	Sep 12, 2007 12:42
I wish a less subjective reviewer had written this piece. Mr. Kirsch frets throughout that Davies' alleged lack of objectivity... [MORE]	jeepgypsy	Sep 10, 2007 15:05
Keep in mind, as even Churchill noted after the war, that the USSR did the bulk of the fighting against...	We were fortunate	Sep 10, 2007 09:39
Dear RTK -- don't try to pull the age thing on Tom. It's like arguing that you only can understand... [MORE]	John	Sep 10, 2007 00:26
Granted John, it's not impossible to understand things you have no experience of, but that being said, comprehending the international... [MORE]	Avi	Sep 10, 2007 11:37
I have always been amused by people who buy our wartime propaganda that we were fighting for freedom and democracy... [MORE]	tom	Sep 5, 2007 03:43
My guess is that "tom" who so smugly wrote "snicker, snicker" is under the age of 70, and knows only... [MORE]	rtk	Sep 5, 2007 21:59