Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
The Edifice of Pinkerism
in response to reader comment: Pinker will be wrong just as Locke was wrong

Submitted by Laurie, Sep 12, 2007 18:47

"Man is not measurable in words or in numbers and that is where the whole idea of cognitve psychology fails. Unless the field can admit to this then we will just continue our mistakes till there is nothing left of us on this planet or anywhere"

Man is easily measurable when we look at the concrete manifestation of all this cognition......behaviour. Similarly the processes that produce this behaviour are increasingly accessible through the tools of neuroscience. These processes however, will always be elusive to those who hope to capture them using concepts developed in pre-scientific times or anything but the vocabulary of neuroscience. Psychology is moving very rapidly towards a solid scientific basis and it seems to me that the understandings it develops over the next few decades may actually be critical to improving the lot of humans and reducing the self-destructive behaviour that has cursed our history. To cling to the notion that human consciousness is somehow so special that it will not yield its secrets to scientists is to ignore the best hope we have for the future. The planet, I suspect, can take care of itself.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

It has been about one year since we had our discussion on the 'mind'. And I suspect that Dr Y... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy 

Sep 28, 2008 08:15

This is where 'facts' are really nonsense in disguise. If one has a hypothesis that cannot be proved or disproved... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy 

Nov 12, 2007 06:42

The confusion of any philosophical science that has no heart What I find so alarming is that our most learned, our... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 27, 2007 03:21

Pinker's postulations still resonates with the 'soft innatism' and "cast of basic concepts" of a Longinian (Longinus) prefiguration of thought.... [MORE]

obrian worrell 

Sep 24, 2007 16:25

Latin is figurative speech, right? Well just look up any word of Latin or Greek origin and you will get... [MORE]

Jean-Philippe De Lasalle 

Sep 19, 2007 21:07

I think what has me so dismayed by rational science in regards to human beings, as we want to practice... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 19, 2007 05:38

We have heard of Evolution as "survival of the fittest," but I understand that studies of chaos and emergence give... [MORE]

John House 

Sep 21, 2007 00:08

Pinker's verbal brilliance has been obscured by his inadequate theory and frequent misrepresentation of facts. I demonstrated this in an article... [MORE]

Bruce I. Kodish 

Sep 18, 2007 12:59

adding "ism's" to authors (darwinism's, dawkinism's, pinkerism's) is lazy, sloppy and silly, please refrain. these authors have stated empirically verifiable... [MORE]

michael farr 

Sep 14, 2007 19:49

I very much doubt that steven Pinker is the cognitive sicentist of our time. first and foremost he is a... [MORE]

charles leighton 

Sep 14, 2007 06:18

I once attended a public lecture by Steven Pinker at my university. The event was so popular that I had... [MORE]

W. Dean 

Sep 13, 2007 20:29

--- "But has any serious thinker actually held this form of innatism? No; it's at best a heuristic for actual... [MORE]

p. bourges-waldegg 

Sep 16, 2007 02:56

Pinker's "sensitivity to subtle semantic distinctions" echoes Anatole France's maxim that "truth lies in the nuances." Basically, this is the... [MORE]

William Hoffman, Ph.D. 

Sep 13, 2007 15:39

I haven't read the book, but from what examples are given here of the "cast of basic concepts," it seems... [MORE]

Marc Andre Belanger 

Sep 13, 2007 10:27

I apologize for saying cognitive psychology has no merit. I don't mean that. But it does have issues that those... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 13, 2007 07:34

A very gracious apology Dr McCarthy as well as several valid points that clarify your position. I agree completely with... [MORE]

Laurie 

Sep 13, 2007 17:58

John Locke is an eighteenth-century philosopher by only a hair's breadth. Locke died in 1704; his most important works appeared... [MORE]

R. Franklin Carter 

Sep 12, 2007 20:00

Logrolling much? But yeah, Pinker is probably more or less on the same level as Roughgarden, though maybe a little... [MORE]

Martin Browning 

Sep 12, 2007 15:53

Pinker making diffenence between mind and brain, really speaking all our thinking ,feeling, sensation, language born from brain. We know... [MORE]

Ramesh Raghuvanshi 

Sep 12, 2007 11:32

It may sound impressive to detail a fundamental relationship with language and mind but first one must determine what is... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 12, 2007 06:48

A bit difficult to make out what Dr. McCarthy is going on about...over 500 words to express what seems to... [MORE]

Kyle 

Sep 12, 2007 12:03

"Man is not measurable in words or in numbers and that is where the whole idea of cognitve psychology fails....

Laurie 

Sep 12, 2007 18:47

Sorry, couldn't help it. First there's this comment, Dr. McCarthy:The problem is psychology is not a true science. It is not... [MORE]

Psychologist Y, PhD 

Sep 14, 2007 22:01

I went to a university where psychology was in the school of Arts and Letters. I majored in psychology as... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 15, 2007 07:22

You are right in one aspect in that I did not clarify my thoughts in a more detailed way. Dr.... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 16, 2007 04:32

First, don't take the McCarthyism thing too seriously - it was just a play on "Pinkerism" via a reference to... [MORE]

Psychologist Y, PhD 

Sep 16, 2007 22:35

Dear Dr Y, I think you agree with me at one level yet do not realize it. You believe that science... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 17, 2007 18:27

Perhaps we're just talking about different things here. First, I am not a clinical psychologist. Like Pinker, I am an... [MORE]

Psychologist Y, PhD 

Sep 18, 2007 09:37

I understand that you are in experimental evolutionary psychology. And I understand that you believe that cognition, whatever on this... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 18, 2007 18:25

This is why I say that what you will try to do 'scientifically' in regards to the self is never... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 20, 2007 04:01

Well I've given the whole idea of the relation between the mind and reality some thought and this is part... [MORE]

Jean-Philippe de Lasalle 

Sep 23, 2007 09:15

Remember to keep categories/fields straight and don't forget fundamentals. Mathematics is much more than idea. It gives one a sense... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Sep 30, 2007 22:58

I know what I have said here is a bit upsetting to psychologists/ neurologists, to physicists, to mathematicians, to biologists,... [MORE]

Andrew McCarthy MD 

Oct 7, 2007 06:34

The reason Pinker is difficult to refute is because his ideas and evidence are those of a chameleon. He... [MORE]

esya 

Nov 6, 2007 15:42

Jerry Fodor is a philosopher.Yiddish is inherently funny.Etc. [MORE]

Fitz 

Sep 12, 2007 06:41

Comment on The Edifice of Pinkerism

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.