I'm not sure what you mean when you say that the books of Mssrs Dawkins and Hitchens "justify" how people live today.
Do you mean to suggest that we (as a people) live immorally, and that books that reveal that Atheism is more than likely the correct philosophy allow us to do so? Perhaps.
Or do you mean (and I'd agree) that people tend to live *better* and *more moral* lives without religious dogma and fervour allowing them justify their bad behaviour. Do I have to point out Sept 11th?
Religion can be used to excuse bad behaviour; rationalism cannot. Real good behaviour comes from knowing that each and everyone one of us only has one chance to do well by others. Doing good due to fear of the hearafter is an horrendous concept.
I very much hope that we're witnessing the end of major religions. Let's free ourselves of these ancient and obviously wrong mythologies and embrace a furture where we use our brains.
-=danny=-
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
A new blog that may be of interest to readers of Charles Taylor's A Secular Age:
http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/. [MORE]
Jonathan VanAntwerpen
Oct 25, 2007 22:39
The fate of 'Christian' culture rests soley on a new interpretation of the moral teachings of Christ that is spreading... [MORE]
Robert Landbeck
Oct 3, 2007 14:36
It's hard to see this as a secular age when 85 percent of Americans say they believe in God, and... [MORE]
Scott Miller
Sep 17, 2007 16:53
I'm not sure what you mean when you say that the books of Mssrs Dawkins and Hitchens "justify" how people...
Danny Walker
Sep 13, 2007 17:00
First of all, Christianity of the past has nothing to brag about. Think of Father Coughlin and Henry Ford who... [MORE]