Not all of your comments were incorrect. We all have an opinion and I respect that but the people who attacked the USA on 9/11 don't all live in Iraq. The United States has flexed their muscle in the Middle East. They pretty much destroyed Afghanistan, and are doing the same to Iraq, with Iran and Syria next in their sights. There are plenty of innocent men, women, and children whose lives will never be the same because of the United States. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the USA help all of these so called terrorists and tyrants come to power in that region. By the way, where's Osama? The USA has a history of cooperating and doing business with people only to turn around and paint them as bad news once they have served their purpose. (Manuel Noriega, Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, just to name a few. I'm sure there's more we will never hear about)
A few thousands soldiers died fighting in Iraq, but wars do kill people. especially the people holding weapons. the soldiers knew they had a chance to die by going over there. They should not have joined the military if they did not want to die by mortars or suicide bombers. This war will never be won. If a "win" means wiping out a race of people, then the USA should just drop another Atom Bomb on the entire region, and just protect the Jews, of course. A few thousand people died on 9/11 and it was tragic. However, the USA has killed Millions, if not billions of people worldwide. 9/11 was a response to the constant coddling of Israel by the USA. Who wins if the US leaves Iraq, how about people who value their life. The US is the biggest terrorist in the entire world. I'm an American, tax-paying citizen by the way.
The news reports that a few Soldiers, died in the constant fighting in Iraq. How many innocent people died from the US bombings in the start of this war? How many innocents died in the Israeli bombing of Lebanon. Peace will never be reached throughout the world, not with the USA farming all of these terrorists.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
I never thought it would happen, I agree with "W" - send the Baker crew home. This rescue mission has... [MORE]
W
Dec 7, 2006 14:22
Wars always have a winner and a loser, just like any other contest of will, strenght, and intelligence. In the... [MORE]
Andrew Christensen
Dec 6, 2006 22:50
Not all of your comments were incorrect. We all have an opinion and I respect that but the people who...
Chris
Dec 7, 2006 16:55
It's interesting the degree of ignorance that seems to be employed in making judgements on this topic. "Islamic Lunacy" hmm?... [MORE]
Nerith
Nov 28, 2006 23:27
Here is the problem, we are incapable of producing, promoting, imposing or dictating to a vastly different mindset what it... [MORE]
dan kelsey
Nov 28, 2006 12:52
Appeasing Jihad Terrorists by agreeing to sit down with Iran and Syria and 'negotiate' a fair and reasonable assessment of... [MORE]
Ralph Emerson Benn
Nov 27, 2006 23:23
Why not ask the Iraqis whether they want U.S. troops to stay in Iraq? They have had successful elections before,... [MORE]
Don Watson
Nov 21, 2006 20:55
I think that an Army can fight an Army - But an army cannot fight guerilla (terrorism) activity. I think... [MORE]
Graham Hall
Nov 14, 2006 12:50
We can win in Iraq. Here are some of the ideas: [MORE]
Jack Lee
Nov 13, 2006 16:41
A Strategy to Win the War in Iraq.
It took such a short time to win the war in Iraq, nobody... [MORE]
mark kazais
Nov 11, 2006 10:22
We definitely need local informants but we are unable to get them because they cannot trust America to stay the... [MORE]
Kathy
Nov 13, 2006 23:28
A fine example of neocon double-speak. The first sentence of your essay entitled "A Strategy to Win the War in... [MORE]
Jake Burns
Nov 14, 2006 15:38
The constantly increasing violence along with the little or no progress in the fight against terrorism in Iraq indicates that... [MORE]
mark kazais
Nov 10, 2006 18:11
Bush has refused to fight to thoroughly defeat and vanquish the psychopathic islamics everywhere.
The question is why. The USA has... [MORE]
columbus columbus
Nov 8, 2006 22:24
The neoconservatives took over and charged off into Iraq and failed miserably. You want to destroy the entire Islamic lunacy.... [MORE]
C. Hutchins
Nov 10, 2006 14:38
The whole problem about Iraq is that we didn't have the guts to win. Americans don't like losing, don't like... [MORE]
Kay
Nov 14, 2006 04:22
The whole problem about Iraq is that we didn't have the guts to win. Americans don't like losing, don't like... [MORE]
Kay
Nov 14, 2006 18:49
Bush and his team chose not to fight the islamofascist psychopaths to win and totally vanquish the islamists and their... [MORE]
columbus columbus
Nov 16, 2006 00:14
Perfect name for this response. This is very close to what the American Gov't was saying as an excuse to... [MORE]
Anishinabequay
Nov 25, 2006 17:42
At last common sense is prevailing over a destructive and divisive war. With a US puppet government in Iraq, a... [MORE]
Ann
Dec 5, 2006 12:39
Islamic murderous lunacy? What about U.S. "Christian" murderous lunacy paying for Israeli acts of terror against Palestinian civilians since the... [MORE]
Ziad Khoury
Dec 11, 2007 16:23
U.S.'s troops provide the only current source of stability in IRAQ. Knowing that the U.S. will keep things from getting... [MORE]
john strasburger
Nov 2, 2006 20:57
Hello,
Please help to get this program out to the world and the Baker Commission!
Please, - help create a diplomatic team... [MORE]
hugh
Dec 5, 2006 11:15
Comment on Baker's Panel Rules Out Iraq Victory
Would You Like to Become a Sustaining Subscriber of the Sun? Sign up now