Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Al Qaeda Breach Called ‘Serious' but ‘Reparable'

Submitted by R. Laycock, Oct 12, 2007 08:30

Please note that this whole story was a phony. It's been clearly shown that the ABC leaked video was dated 1 day before SITE supposedly turned the video over to the White House. So obviously ABC didn't get the video from SITE via the White House. All of SITE's chest beating is either a well-meaning error or a publicity stunt. The Sun's report that monitoring of Al Qaeda has been damaged is also in question. Several intelligence sources have reported that they are still monitoring and were not hampered by the leak. Whoever your source is they are contradicted by several other sources on the net who have established credibility. What's true? I don't know but neither do you. Richard L.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

When will our news agencies learn that being first with a story is not as important as our security. Most... [MORE]

Tim 

Oct 12, 2007 19:45

Please note that this whole story was a phony. It's been clearly shown that the ABC leaked video was dated...

R. Laycock 

Oct 12, 2007 08:30

Comment on Al Qaeda Breach Called ‘Serious' but ‘Reparable'

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.