Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Debate Erupts Over Timing of Ruling On Gay Rites by Court in New Jersey

Submitted by David A. Young, Nov 1, 2006 04:03

Number one, are they delusional enough to think that any vote they cast will affect the New Jersey decision? Number two, are they aware that the three dissenting justices in the 4-3 ruling dissented because they objected to allowing equality for same-gender couples to be called anything but marriage, and that all three of those justices were Republican appointees? How much more betrayal does the religious right need before they wake up and realize they're being played and tricked into voting against their own self-interest, all so they can keep my beloved and me from exchanging wedding vows? Is that really their number one priority given how badly Republicans have screwed things up over the last six years?


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

The Sun and perhaps many others, wonder why the NJ Supreme Court ruled when they did, the answer is very... [MORE]

Kevin Churchill 

Nov 1, 2006 08:52

I agree with Kevin Churchill on the reason for the timing. While I do not agree with most of what... [MORE]

Thomas Murphy 

Nov 7, 2006 01:37

Number one, are they delusional enough to think that any vote they cast will affect the New Jersey decision? Number...

David A. Young 

Nov 1, 2006 04:03

Comment on Debate Erupts Over Timing of Ruling On Gay Rites by Court in New Jersey

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.