It is important that every American understand that this next Presidential election will be the most pivotal in our countries history. You will not hear these views expressed in the mainstream media with any degree of urgency. Why that is, I can only speculate, but I suspect special interests keep the media in check. The harsh reality is that the forces allied against us both foreign and domestic are formidable, to say the least. If we do not stand up and face them together in a unified way they will overwhelm us.
In no particular order:
We have been in Iraq now for longer than we were in World War Two. The cost of this exercise is projected to be between 1-2 Trillion dollars. Now, I am all for protecting our national interests but let's be realistic, I think we have done more than enough for the people of Iraq. It is their future let them be the stewards of it. If we truly want them to practice democracy then let them choose their own path, even if that means the only democratic choice they make in their lives is to not to be a democratic. This war has dragged on for way to long. Am I the only one who thinks the argument that we are fighting terrorists there, in order not to fight them here, is so moronically simplistic as to be insulting? This war must end and we need to let the chips fall where they may. We have more pressing domestic problems on the horizon.
Illegal immigration is an issue that must be addressed in a practical way. With an estimated 12-20 million illegal immigrants currently residing in the U.S. with more entering the country every day, the impact on the US taxpayer is an unfair burden. I see this as an affront to the American people's sensibilities. It is obvious that these people have broken our laws and are being rewarded for it. I cannot reconcile any argument for allowing them to stay in the country, least of all the argument that it is simply expedient. If for some reason, they were allowed naturalization, the result would be a political shift changing the balance of power in the country. How can anyone with a conscience and a sense of fairness justify this outcome? Regardless of the reason, they broke our laws and violated our sovereignty. Simply put, they are criminals and should be treated as such. I do not care that they work hard and do the jobs for much less than US workers. If we allow them citizenship, all that would end overnight as they would then be subject to protection under US labor laws. Any politician that supports the case for letting them stay is simply Un-American and deserves to be removed from office. After all, are not our leaders supposed to be upholding our laws? They do not have the right to choose which laws they will enforce and which they will ignore because of a personal bias. It is a dereliction of duty for our leaders to undermine our system of laws. It might take time, but we should systematically deport these people and tighten the control of our borders so that they cannot return. In addition, a law needs to be passed that any children born of illegal immigrants in this country should be returned to the parent's country of origin. The law that allows them citizenship now was not intended for illegal aliens but only for those people in this country legally.
Fiscally, the United States is on the brink of insolvency, the rest of the world knows it even if the majority of Americans do not. This issue is pivotal. The power of the United States is not derived from its military might but from its wealth. A countries wealth is created when its labor is used to take raw materials and fashion them into products that have increased value, which then can be sold outside of the country increasing the countries coffers. Since the advent of globalization, our manufacturing capabilities have been drastically reduced. The economy in the United States has become increasingly service based. The fastest growing jobs in the US are service jobs. According the bureau of labor statistics the fastest growing jobs in the US are:
1. Computer systems software engineer
2. Computer applications software engineer
3. Biomedical engineer
4. Physician assistant
5. Environmental engineer
6. Computer systems analyst
7. Database administrator
8. Physical therapist
9. Network systems and data communication analyst
10. Hydrologist
Not a single one of these jobs on this list can be considered a manufacturing based job. We have software, health care, and environmental industries represented. What is important about this list is that very little cross border wealth transfer occurs due to these industries, certainly nothing to put on a ship and export.
It is impossible for our economy to grow unless we are increasing the countries overall wealth. I take exception with the way our government reports economic growth in the US via the GDP. Over 70% of the US Gross Domestic Product is consumer spending! Let that sink in for a moment. That means that the government is calculating growth on the amount of money that we spend. Most of that spending is on goods from foreign countries and a good deal of that spending recently was borrowed due to people using their homes as an ATM machine. I have always viewed my own economic growth on how much my net worth increases and not on how much of my net worth I spent. Is what the GDP represents really economic growth? Hardly, since most of this money is ending up overseas. In order for there to be true growth the US trade deficit would have to be negative. As long as the trade deficit positive then our economy is retracting.
Now this retraction is being represented by the weakening of our nation's currency. The dollar has fell 10.5% this year alone. Given the aforementioned fact, that we are running a huge trade deficit and our currency is weakening, it naturally follows that we will be paying more for imported goods. Oil is now approaching the $100 per barrel mark and I believe that this will continue to move higher in the near future.
Anyone who is trying to save money without risking it in the stock market can attest to not being able to keep up with inflation. The CPI is a fantasy. It is yet another sleight of hand number that the US government uses to lull the population into thinking that inflation is under control. Without going into detail, I suggest you look up how this is calculated and decide for yourselves if the government is in fact misleading the public.
The trade deficit is not the only reason that we will be seeing inflation increase in the United Sates. A good deal of the blame should be put squarely on the shoulders of the US Central Bank. This organization created by congress in 1913 has systematically increased the US money supply devaluing our currency. The bubble economies of the last two decades are a direct result of their policies. The current housing market debacle is a perfect example. The central bank under Alan Greenspan's leadership lowered the overnight bank rates to a paltry one percent in order to promote domestic economic growth as they measure it with the GDP. Again this promoted spending and not saving. Because interest rates were so low, mortgages rates were favorable; this in turn increased demand and drove housing through the roof. This chain of events was further exacerbated by the investment banks. Since, mortgage rates are typically a couple of points higher than the Fed's overnight rate the investment banks saw an opportunity. They in their infinite wisdom bought mortgages from the primary lenders and packaged them into SIV's and CDO's which were then made available to only the wealthiest investors, pension and mutual fund managers. As a result, the primary lenders were again and again infused with cash and continued to originate mortgages. Once the conventional loan market (those with good credit) was exhausted, the banks lowered their lending standards and the subprime market was born. Institutions now began lending to unqualified borrowers and real estate speculators which the investment banks packaged and sold as well. This went on until the first batch of adjustable rate mortgages reset and the unqualified borrowers began to default because they could not afford the higher payments. As a result the income stream to the CDO's and SIV's began to dry up and the investment banks could no longer pay dividends to their investors. In addition, the underlying value of the homes the mortgages were based upon fell making it next to impossible for the investment banks to value the assets. Because of the difficulty in valuing these assets, banks became reticent to lend to one another because they did not have a clear picture of each other's collateral and thus a credit crisis ensued. So this is where we find ourselves today. The credit markets are in turmoil, housing prices are still falling and the bottom is nowhere in sight.
Instead of letting the market work like it should by punishing the investment banks and those invested in these toxic financially engineered CDO's and SIV's and other speculative investments, including real estate speculators. The Federal Reserve stepped in and began printing money to alleviate the pressure on the credit markets. As a result, the appearance of a massive bailout has caused a run on the dollar. Ben Bernanke has effectively placed the burden on the citizenry by devaluing the currency. When asked about the Central Banks response to the credit crisis due to the effect of printing money and devaluing the currency at the recent senate banking committee hearing, Ben Bernanke basically gave what can only be described as a "let them eat cake" response. In essence, he dismissed the idea that the Central Banks recent actions were inflationary saying that since Americans were paid in dollars and what they buy is in dollars therefore there is no effect on the US consumer of the recent dollar devaluation. I find that to be a contemptuous statement. Given the current price of oil, food, and other commodities, Bernanke is either very stupid or very out of touch. I think the statement alone shows his lack of mental acumen because, his response shows an arrogant disdain for the average American. He is biting the hand that feeds him and will continue to do so until we put a stop to this madness.
We are all now paying for the sins of greedy financial institutions and the irresponsible Federal Reserve. Now the worst part of all of this is that the Fed is an independent institution that controls the US money supply. When the Fed "injects liquidity" they simply create money out of thin air and, get this, they extract a fee for it. They make money on every dollar they print. The printing of money and the deliberate devaluation of the currency is a hidden tax on the American people by an unelected body. This is unconstitutional, as it is taxation without representation. There is no other way to look at it. The Congress of the United States was specifically given the power to create money in the Constitution. In 1913 they delegated the authority to the Federal Reserve giving them complete autonomy. In my view the Federal Reserve needs to be eliminated and control of the money supply given back to the people through their elected officials.
Given the current economic realities the government must reign in spending and take on the issues of paying off the national debt which is 9.1 trillion and counting. How are we to pay this back? There is no other way then to reduce government spending and eliminate domestic government liabilities, namely the massive amount of entitlement debt in this country. Congress just raised the cap on the national debt by 850 billion dollars to 9.815 trillion because on October 1 the debt surpassed the limit of 9 trillion dollars. Since then, it is already at 9.1 trillion and increases at the rate of 183 million dollars a day due to interest and, the rate is accelerating. It will not be more than three months and they will have to increase the cap again. This is tantamount to letting a borrower who is over their credit card limit to continually raise the limit and make the minimum payments with the increased credit. This is a staggering problem. Are we going to address this or wait until we default on or obligations and become a third world economy?
Is it not apparent that we cannot continue with the status quo? Is it not obvious that our elected officials are not doing their jobs? We need to make the hard choices now, before it is too late. If we wait they will be forced upon them by a worthless currency and a massive recession. Our leaders through inaction driven by fear of not being elected are not shooting straight with the American people. They are robbing your futures and selling our children's into economic slavery.
The cruel reality is that it is now too late to save Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. We just have to except that as a fact. We cannot continue to delude ourselves that we can have our cake and eat it too. The current estimate of the entitlement obligations over the next 20 years is 50 trillion dollars. Hey, we simply do not have it. As I mentioned before, our economy is retracting based on the trade deficit. The only way the government can collect this much in revenue is to put an undue tax burden on the next generation. The additional burden, I might add, is one that those getting ready to retire did not have to shoulder themselves. The retiring generation should have paid more attention to what their government was doing with their money. It is not the future generation's fault that they allowed themselves to be swindled by their leaders. It is up to the future generation to make sure that they are not similarly misled.
It behooves us to eliminate these programs for retirees who, through a means test, are determined not to require it. Any savings incurred should be applied to paying off the national debt and returning solvency to our country. Tax reform must be undertaken to close loopholes for the rich and for corporations in order to insure everyone is paying their fair share. We should also include tax incentives for small businesses as they are who employs the vast majority of Americans. Small business is currently carrying too great a load of the tax burden.
Major changes must be made in order for our country not to be undermined. We cannot keep putting off the hard choices we face simply because they are unpopular.
We can make a difference if only we make ourselves heard. We have to be prepared to take drastic measures in order to ensure that our government represents us and not the special interests. We need wholesale change in our government. That means we do not vote for career politicians but, for honest citizens, who understand the crisis we are facing and are willing to begin by reforming our government. No solutions are possible until government reform is implemented. That means our elected officials have to give up the perks and limit the influence of the moneyed special interests.
Can you honestly say that the current crop of people running for higher office in this country is selfless enough to embrace wholesale change? These people have been born of this corrupt system. We have to look outside the parties and find qualified individuals to change the way we conduct our government. I for one do not want to reward anyone involved in getting us to this point. Because either they were too stupid to realize what was going on or to corrupt to care.
I used to be a republican, until George W. Bush exorbitantly increased the debt by overwhelming proportions. I called the republican national committee when Bush was promoting his immigration bill and simply asked them whether or not they supported the bill. I could not get a straight answer. They lost me then and there. I simply cannot be a democrat because I believe in personal responsibility and they do not. I now consider myself not only an independent but, more importantly a pragmatist. I have been driven to this by the reality that, no matter who occupies the highest offices in our land, nothing significantly changes. Each successive congress fails to address the biggest issues of our day. They are mired in party politics and self interest. The American people are getting lost in the shuffle and we should be angry about it, angry enough to spark change.
Let there be no mistake about it. This election is going to be about the economic future of the country. We are at a fork in the river that once passed there will be no going back. Now is the time to choose. Now is the time to speak out and be heard. It really is up to us.
Richard Clark
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
I think the guy is drinking too much wine at 175.00 a bottle. Is the market over due for a... [MORE]
Randy
Nov 12, 2007 17:44
yes you can have a roi of 175%-especially if large portions of your money is invested overseas!!!!!!!!!! [MORE]
ehiemere
Nov 12, 2007 23:16
Hello!! 175% isn't an interest rate, it's the yield on his hedge fund and you can bet your life that... [MORE]
jackiebaron
Nov 13, 2007 04:30
Having the foresight to see (at least 4 years ago) that the real estate market would go down in flames... [MORE]
Jack
Nov 12, 2007 15:36
The deflation of currency...
I don't understand how this is being interpreted as the end of the US economy. If our... [MORE]
mark
Nov 12, 2007 15:25
Not appropriate to publish Mr. Melchor's remarks as a future prognosis. Mr. Melchor, an admitted bear, would naturally wish to... [MORE]
Cyro
Nov 12, 2007 15:03
Back in the late 90s when the Asian markets had dropped dramatically over a short period of time and Mexico... [MORE]
Goodbye Natalie
Nov 12, 2007 14:48
too much debt, too many billionaires, too much taxation, too many attorneys, too much fat, too many people, too much... [MORE]
phil
Nov 12, 2007 14:39
That we are in unique times is a common (and always true) statement that always pops up as if the... [MORE]
joe stafura
Nov 12, 2007 14:38
I hope this guy is wrong. Then again, he apparently is smart enough to generate a 175% return on his... [MORE]
Mike Foti
Nov 12, 2007 14:37
WHile the dollar is weak by historical standards for sure, this is after it being unusually strong. It had to... [MORE]
Shaun
Nov 12, 2007 14:36
I have seen this coming for about 5 years , and the current real estate dilema is a product ,... [MORE]
Bob Graham Las Vegas
Nov 12, 2007 14:31
This "news report/editorial/whatever" seems to be more of an advertisement for Balstera Capital Partners than as a legit news item,... [MORE]
SilasSez
Nov 12, 2007 14:21
The Central Bankers who manipulate economies around the World for their benifit always win from these economic disasters. Of course... [MORE]
Aldo Watts
Nov 12, 2007 14:20
What the Bush Administration, Fed and Wall Street can't see is the American Economy, which purchases over 30% of all... [MORE]
G.
Nov 12, 2007 13:59
Is he kidding? Buy gold now? It's already $800 an ounce, and the highest I can remember is just short... [MORE]
Jay
Nov 12, 2007 13:51
Mark-o made the comment that the reason there is a need for foreign trained workers is based on too few... [MORE]
DKM
Nov 12, 2007 14:30
The US Dollar has been inflated by multiples so when you talk about the record highs from 1980, please refer... [MORE]
Peter Spina
Nov 12, 2007 15:19
If you include inflation, $800 gold in 1980 is equal to $2142 gold in 2006. So relative prices are still... [MORE]
Bill Bob
Nov 12, 2007 15:23
what we are witnesssing is a long range play ,which was written years ago.Even our politicians do not know they... [MORE]
B. Kuhl
Nov 12, 2007 15:51
Yep Gold. Look how it escalated during the depression era. More importantly look how it dramatically appreciated during the high... [MORE]
Willy
Nov 12, 2007 16:31
The U.S. is a business....and how you run a business reflects on your success. How you treat your customers (other... [MORE]
Doug
Nov 12, 2007 18:58
Ron Paul's idea of eliminating the Federal Reserve banking-cartel, and getting America back on a sound currency is our only... [MORE]
ron heringhauser
Nov 12, 2007 13:50
Fully agree that a bigtime recession is coming soon. Problem I have is that the GW Bush Administration has contributed... [MORE]
Mike Adams
Nov 12, 2007 13:48
The bad news is that recesion will (hopefully, temporarily only) lower the average living standards of working Americans.
The good news... [MORE]
A Reader
Nov 12, 2007 13:31
Is everything these days the worst ever. I don't know about anyone else but I've had the best 7 years... [MORE]
James McCue
Nov 12, 2007 13:30
Both major political parties continue to recommend and implement policies that guarantee our inevitible economic collapse. These include: 1.) Interventionist... [MORE]
Frank Kellam
Nov 12, 2007 13:23
They have been calling our economy a consumer driven economy for years. In truth they should be calling it a... [MORE]
Raymond Allen
Nov 12, 2007 13:19
If a currency is debased by the banking controllers, then why wouldn't prices rise on the goods companies sell and... [MORE]
Carl Schattke
Nov 12, 2007 13:17
Wow. Ballestra is a bear fund, meaning it makes more on a falling market because it uses short sale models... [MORE]
Chicagolawyer
Nov 12, 2007 13:16
If your expert had any lick of sense he would understand that during the 1930's we had a depression not... [MORE]
bob johnson
Nov 12, 2007 13:15
Spoken like a true Demacrat. Always wallowing in worst case senarios. Maybe Global warming will end humanity's time on earth... [MORE]
Massapequa Mike
Nov 12, 2007 13:06
People are spending money they do not have. In this lies the solution. When you do not have the income... [MORE]
Todd
Nov 12, 2007 12:53
If one talks long enough; some eventualities will occur in due course of information volume. Stick that lightening rod up... [MORE]
Jay
Nov 12, 2007 12:32
Jimmy Carter: Over 20% Prime Ineterest Rate, Over 10% Unemployment Rate, Over 10% Inflation rate. The economy is expanding right... [MORE]
MMW
Nov 12, 2007 12:22
...I have sent 860+ resumes since 14.June.07; I'm a graduate of high school, college, trade school & 'adult.continuing.edu' efforts... [MORE]
R.g. Frano, N.R.-E.M.T.-P, A.C.L.S.
Nov 12, 2007 12:22
Funny thing about this so-called talk, the people who always stand to benefit are the one's doing the talking. Our... [MORE]
Schratboy
Nov 12, 2007 12:20
While I agree that we are heading towards a 1981-82 type recession it wont be for a few more years...2010-2012.... [MORE]
Joey
Nov 12, 2007 12:58
I agree with the last comment. Rockerfella and his elitist friends are puppeteers, and we ae the puppets. I do... [MORE]
George
Nov 12, 2007 13:19
Talk like this is just more of the media attempt to push the economy into a recession. For years we... [MORE]
Jake B
Nov 12, 2007 13:47
so, some hedge fund worth 350 million says there will be a recession worse than the 30s. this is worthy... [MORE]
cousin brucie
Nov 12, 2007 17:21
"It's the campaign issue stupid" The democrats have to have something to run on, The war must going well because... [MORE]
Dave DeBord
Nov 12, 2007 17:40
Yep.. I watched 'The Money Masters' on Google Video and that was a real eyeopener. [MORE]
fhb
Nov 13, 2007 13:16
My three year old grandaughter appears to have more insight than Jake. Evidently Jake thinks a credit card is a... [MORE]
Dale
Jan 12, 2008 16:48
Even though most of the Wall Street crowd don't talk much about it, there are grudging admission that our out-of-control... [MORE]
Mike Brooks
Nov 12, 2007 12:20
Free trade isnt repsonible for our economic problem, that's ridiculous...it is easy money since 1998 that created the tech bubble... [MORE]
Joey
Nov 12, 2007 12:59
China rules us economically. Thanks to brilliant planners like Sam Walton and his schlock Wal Mart stores.
The mortgage thieves are... [MORE]
Brian Foster
Nov 12, 2007 13:01
Jim Melcher has been talking up the same story for years, and why, because he has the most to gain... [MORE]
Matt
Nov 12, 2007 13:01
Your right to a certain extent, but a bigger factor is this: We have been buying on credit in this... [MORE]
Doug
Nov 12, 2007 13:08
The banks and mortgage companies made horrible loans in mass for short term gains to boost stock prices. They deceived... [MORE]
Andy Marks
Nov 12, 2007 13:53
Anyone who has studied American or World History during the 1920's and 1930's knows that the Great Depression in the... [MORE]
ED Jones
Nov 12, 2007 13:57
The idea that Americans with a high level of technical skills are being "replaced" by cheap foreign workers is nonsense.... [MORE]
mark-o
Nov 12, 2007 14:16
The Robber Barrons old would be proud of the new Greedy Grabbers. When this propped up joke of an economy... [MORE]
Guiedo in FL
Nov 12, 2007 14:42
I recently hired a guy from India with a masters degree in engineering. The guy did not even know what... [MORE]
F Hughes
Nov 12, 2007 14:46
The USA is made in The Peoples Republic of China. Welcome to the 21st Century. [MORE]
Brent
Nov 12, 2007 14:47
The world market is what is going to save our economy, we are high tech, with plenty of good jobs... [MORE]
Tim
Nov 12, 2007 15:01
I am always amused at the people that talk about the decline of math / science skill and it is... [MORE]
UrDrWho
Nov 12, 2007 15:02
Just the typical talking points of the left, democrats and socialists (communists minus the firing squads). Like Mark said, restriction... [MORE]
John
Nov 12, 2007 15:05
Since science and engineering jobs can be outsourced to foreigners (language and culture being less of an issue), the salaries... [MORE]
Bill Bob
Nov 12, 2007 15:31
Mike your absolutely correct. Business practices today involve outsourcing key engineering positions to 3rd world countries. I've seen it done... [MORE]
tony
Nov 12, 2007 15:33
Taxes! That's the source of all our ILLS! Most former Soviet east-bloc countries have gone away from the "progressive" tax... [MORE]
The kid
Nov 12, 2007 15:39
if trade is done fairly. However, that can only be done between countries based on similar economic policies. The current... [MORE]
Dokidiver
Nov 12, 2007 15:45
Recession? Try Depression! (laughing) What the f*** is a prolonged or "long" recession.
AMERICA deserves this, and until it gets rid... [MORE]
Anthony
Nov 12, 2007 15:58
Mark-o hit the nail on the head when he put "Americans" in quotes. Who is an American? It's anyone drawn... [MORE]
Dovi
Nov 12, 2007 16:01
I'm for free trade and conservative. Any talk of recession is a precursor to big banking asking for a bailout... [MORE]
Gaffer
Nov 12, 2007 16:10
I am in management in a Fortune 100 company and what I say I could not never say at work... [MORE]
Outsourcing is bad
Nov 12, 2007 16:17
You sure its not Mel Brooks? Economics is a science best served cold. Our outsourcing of production in the current... [MORE]
RatFanner
Nov 12, 2007 16:46
Folks,its failure of leadership from the top for the passed several adminstrations and Corporations selling America down the tube. This... [MORE]
Nawang
Nov 12, 2007 16:53
Calls for restrictions on trade, when scratched hard enough, generally show nostalgia underneath. The more pathetic version asks us to... [MORE]
raul tsan
Nov 12, 2007 17:07
Being a mexican citizen and a political analyst, I would tell you all that things look pretty bad from where... [MORE]
Vicente Licona Galdi
Nov 12, 2007 19:07
I can go on for hours on this topic but here are the basic points of what I have to... [MORE]
Martin CPA In CT
Nov 12, 2007 19:13
In the unlikely event of Hughes scenario, the wealthy will simply hire Blackwater mercs to snuff plebeian mob leaders. Perhaps... [MORE]
Robert
Nov 13, 2007 01:51
A great idea, we need to change our voting ideas of the past and vote for someone who is willing... [MORE]
terry lawrence
Nov 13, 2007 01:55
I was formerly employed as an engineer at one of the big Silicon Valley corporations. The company purchased a Chinese... [MORE]
Jason dinAlt
Nov 13, 2007 03:09
Nawang what is a "sheap"? I do not think your advice is predicated on real knowledge. I love the guru's... [MORE]
Islandeagle
Nov 13, 2007 20:52
To the MATRIX. There sure is a lot of people in denial on these posts. Just remember...throughout history banks have... [MORE]
Snadmaster
Nov 13, 2007 21:21
This looks like the handiwork of Mike Nifong. Oh, I forgot he's in jail and disbarred. [MORE]
Kashdog
Nov 16, 2007 03:17
The fact is this ball has been rolling since the meeting that may or may not have transpired on Jekyll... [MORE]
Tom Liddle
Nov 16, 2007 21:46
True. We are sellin' ourselves out faster than you can say "FOR-SALE".Speaking of FOR-SALE, that's what our CONGRESS is. Here's... [MORE]
d.a.n
Nov 22, 2007 09:39
How can we be outsourcing all the jobs you write about , when we have a 4.7% unemployment rate and... [MORE]
william huber
Dec 17, 2007 16:42
Uh, the worst since the 1930s? You mean even worse than the '73-74 recession when we had wage and price... [MORE]
urt
Nov 12, 2007 12:05
Talk of Worst Recession Since the 1930s
And the bird flu and G.W. and on and on. When do we start... [MORE]
brian
Nov 12, 2007 12:02
I am old enough to have lived thru the depression of 1930 and was living on a small farm when... [MORE]