Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Why Reagan Deserves Benefit of Doubt on Racism

Submitted by Jesse Larner, Nov 14, 2007 08:15

So the evidence that Reagan was not a racist comes from -- HIS OWN SELF-SERVING WRITINGS and those of his closest associates? Please. What nonsense.

Here are some hard facts, as Bob Herbert pointed out.

"Everybody watching the 1980 campaign knew what Reagan was signaling at the fair. Whites and blacks, Democrats and Republicans — they all knew. The news media knew. The race haters and the people appalled by racial hatred knew. And Reagan knew.

"He was tapping out the code. It was understood that when politicians started chirping about "states' rights" to white people in places like Neshoba County they were saying that when it comes down to you and the blacks, we're with you.

"And Reagan meant it. He was opposed to the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was the same year that Goodman, Schwerner and Chaney were slaughtered. As president, he actually tried to weaken the Voting Rights Act of 1965. He opposed a national holiday for the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He tried to get rid of the federal ban on tax exemptions for private schools that practiced racial discrimination. And in 1988, he vetoed a bill to expand the reach of federal civil rights legislation.

"Congress overrode the veto.

"Reagan also vetoed the imposition of sanctions on the apartheid regime in South Africa. Congress overrode that veto, too.

"Throughout his career, Reagan was wrong, insensitive and mean-spirited on civil rights and other issues important to black people. There is no way for the scribes of today to clean up that dismal record.

"To see Reagan's appearance at the Neshoba County Fair in its proper context, it has to be placed between the murders of the civil rights workers that preceded it and the acknowledgment by the Republican strategist Lee Atwater that the use of code words like "states' rights" in place of blatantly bigoted rhetoric was crucial to the success of the G.O.P.'s Southern strategy. That acknowledgment came in the very first year of the Reagan presidency.

"Ronald Reagan was an absolute master at the use of symbolism. It was one of the primary keys to his political success.

"The suggestion that the Gipper didn't know exactly what message he was telegraphing in Neshoba County in 1980 is woefully wrong-headed. Wishful thinking would be the kindest way to characterize it. "

I don't think that Reagan hated black people. I think he was utterly indifferent to the lives of people unlike himself, and this observation is thoroughly borne out by his behavior in office. No wonder, then, that the historical implications of lynching were less real to him than a cynical quest for votes.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

For anyone to think that President Ronald Reagan is a racist is simply out of their mind. Ronanld Reagan both... [MORE]

Richard Espinoza 

Nov 19, 2007 13:41

Paul Krugman started this feud about Reagan and it's understandable. If I was a member of a Party which hadn't... [MORE]

Doug 

Nov 14, 2007 16:31

this is resurrected at this time to tarnish any republican who wants to claim an association with the regan legacy//... [MORE]

joel 

Nov 14, 2007 13:58

So the evidence that Reagan was not a racist comes from -- HIS OWN SELF-SERVING WRITINGS and those of his...

Jesse Larner 

Nov 14, 2007 08:15

i regret to say that I find the writer's adduction of all these stories about how some or Reagan's best... [MORE]

Yoel L. Arbeitman 

Nov 14, 2007 01:09

"Hardly close"? I'd say so. At a White House meeting, Reagan shook Pierce's hand and said, "Hello, Mr. Mayor." Mr.... [MORE]

Jonathan Kulick 

Nov 14, 2007 00:27

Comment on Why Reagan Deserves Benefit of Doubt on Racism

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.