Using influence of office to dictate our freedoms
Reader comment on: Mayor Becomes Entangled by Gun Lawsuits

Submitted by Jerrold W. Crafton, Nov 21, 2007 01:39

The first thing I have to say about the whole thing is that intent would have to be proven at least reasonably for anything Bloomberg has to say, if not then he is slandering the owners. If they sell guns to persons legally eligible to buy same, they are within their rights, otherwise the buyers would have reason to sue the owners of the shops.

All of this is the age-old responsibility issue. The legislatures in this country and around the world are trying to take away the self-worth of the individual. How naïve do you have to be to not realize that persons that respect the law do not break the law, only those that do not will. Taking guns away will never stop the killing by criminals, statistics be damned. The fact remains that individuals can do almost anything they want as long as it doesn't affect anyone else. How many freedoms have the American Public naïvely gave up in the last 20 years trying to keep the criminals in check, or how many have been dictated by local, state, and federal legislatures instead of letting the people vote on them. The greatest problem is that people have become complacent about voting and at least attempting to put the person in office that has views similar to theirs. Approximately 30 percent of the populace decide the fate of all of us because they vote, and generally they are of group class, religious, environment etc. I personally do not believe that the mass should let the few guide our freedoms, because the privileged (that vote) are not as influenced by the crimes on the street etc. as much an the AVERAGE individual (that do not vote).

I would like to mention that I have been a policeman, sheriff deputy, been in the military as a military policeman, so it is not like I haven't seen anything. Also at one time did statistical analysis work so understand what you can do with statistics.

Respectfully,

Jerrold W. Crafton

P.S. I do not believe that guns should be the primary objective of criminal activity in New York City. Crime abounds there and guns are a very small percentage of their problems. Perhaps the muggings etc. would be less if the innocent were able to protect themselves and the criminals knew it.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment	By	Date
	don joe	Nov 24, 2007 14:45
Hooray for Congressman Bob Barr. I have long admired him for his straight forward actions and comments. Perhaps more of... [MORE]	Allen R Lewis, USAF Ret	Nov 24, 2007 12:51
	Timothy	Nov 24, 2007 04:06
Yall can't manage your own problems so like a typical northern idiots you try your best to place the blame... [MORE]	SC	Nov 21, 2007 17:00
The first thing I have to say about the whole thing is that intent would have to be proven at...	Jerrold W. Crafton	Nov 21, 2007 01:39
Bloomberg and his condescending, high rise, liberal legal cronies should think about the deadly automatic human weapons (crackhead street thugs)... [MORE]	Woodpiggie	Nov 20, 2007 21:32
bloom needs to stay up there and let all the law abiding people in the south take care of their... [MORE]	mahye	Nov 20, 2007 20:17
The mayors of many cities have tried to paint legitimate firearms dealers with a tar brush, but they have been... [MORE]	Dan	Nov 20, 2007 19:21
Regarding the mayor's hiring of the private detectives, isn't hiring someone to commit a crime in and of itself a... [MORE]	Donna Guziak	Nov 20, 2007 18:55
	lee	Nov 20, 2007 18:25
As a former Police Commissioner, tell Bloomberg to mind his own business and stay in New York. His opposition to... [MORE]	John Smith	Nov 20, 2007 17:57
I applaud the citizens and officials of the state of Georgia. The uncompromising defense of the Federalist stucture of our... [MORE]	Patrick McArthur	Nov 20, 2007 15:33
↔ I'm really looking forward to watching Bloomberg get what's coming to him. He is a pathetic excuse for a leader... [MORE]	Michael Brumley	Nov 21, 2007 03:24
↔ ↔ The reason we gun owners have such a terrible time with these gun control freaks, is we are too complacent... [MORE]	Bart Nielsen	Nov 21, 2007 11:44
↔ ↔ Its about time someone challenged Mr. Bloomberg over his rants against gun owners and dealers. Bob Barr is just the... [MORE]	Art Caprario	Nov 20, 2007 13:41
↔ ↔ It's about time. Mr. Bloomberg has overstepped his boundries. Not only has he made misguided attemps enforce Federal Law, he... [MORE]	Thomas L. Thompson	Nov 20, 2007 12:54
↔ ↔ ↔	No Nannies Allowed	Nov 25, 2007 23:49
↔ ↔ ↔ It's high time Bloomy gets dragged into court for his anti second amendment extra curricular activities. With any luck, his... [MORE]	Merryfield	Nov 20, 2007 12:43
↔ ↔ ↔ Mr. Bloomberg's business should be inside his crime infested city. He definetly had no business to to extend his clutches... [MORE]	Jay	Nov 20, 2007 10:48
↔ ↔ ↔ ↔ Bloomberg's efforts to oppose the civil rights of the law-abiding people are an outrage. Who will he select for his... [MORE]	Wildfire	Nov 21, 2007 08:13
↔ ↔ ↔ ↔	jon	Nov 20, 2007 10:33
↔ ↔ ↔ ↔ Isn't it fun to watch the liberal rich guy get a comeback- Attack legal enterprise and the second amendment with... [MORE]	chuck higgins	Nov 20, 2007 09:20
↔ ↔ ↔ ↔ ↔ I wonder if mister billionaire has a bodyguard. I also wonder if this bodyguard carrys a handgun. He has made... [MORE]	Rip	Nov 21, 2007 02:40
↔ ↔ ↔ ↔ ↔	Mike	Nov 20, 2007 08:53
↔ ↔ ↔ ↔ ↔ ↔ Any person who knowingly sends anyone to buy a firearm under the straw purches claus should be under arrest by... [MORE]	silverbackredneck	Nov 21, 2007 08:48