Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Debate Erupts Over Timing of Ruling On Gay Rites by Court in New Jersey

Submitted by Kevin Churchill, Nov 1, 2006 08:52

The Sun and perhaps many others, wonder why the NJ Supreme Court ruled when they did, the answer is very simple and very bad.

The NJSC ruled on Gay Marriage just days before the Nov 7th election because its chief justice, Deborah Poritz retired the very next day. This is a extreme liberal judge that even the liberal professor Laurence Tribe of Harvard University criticized as "irresponsible". In 2002, Chief Justice Deborah Poritz authored an opinion ordering the Legislature to pay the full cost of preschools for 3- and 4-year-olds. She quoted the educatuion clause of the NJ Constitution but left out the crucial words "between the ages of five and eighteen years." because these words in the Constitution didn't fit her opinion. Then a few months later, in an opinion that permitted the state to bond for billions without voter approval, she quoted the debt-limitation clause, which reads: "The Legislature shall not in any manner create in any fiscal year a debt or debts ... ." The words "in any manner" contradicted her opinion. So she left them out.

During her tenure, New Jersey's Supreme Court wrote many ridiculuous and legally-speaking very poor decisions. Where and when the Poritz Court wanted to write law, it did. Disregarding a Court's obligation to only interpret law.

In the NJSC ruling on Gay Marriage, the Court ordered the state's legislature to write a law in one of two ways to satisfy the Court's liberal agenda because "Times are changing..." At least they will be changing without Poritz making law....


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

The Sun and perhaps many others, wonder why the NJ Supreme Court ruled when they did, the answer is very...

Kevin Churchill 

Nov 1, 2006 08:52

I agree with Kevin Churchill on the reason for the timing. While I do not agree with most of what... [MORE]

Thomas Murphy 

Nov 7, 2006 01:37

Number one, are they delusional enough to think that any vote they cast will affect the New Jersey decision? Number... [MORE]

David A. Young 

Nov 1, 2006 04:03

Comment on Debate Erupts Over Timing of Ruling On Gay Rites by Court in New Jersey

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.