Say it ain't so, Joe (Stalin?) - Reader comments at The New York Sun

Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Stanford's Catch-22

Submitted by John Spencer Yantiss, Nov 28, 2007 18:12

Above ALL else, the factor that blatantly demonstrates the hypocrisy of the vast majority of highly voluable and visible liberal activists is their embrace of the very tenets and tactics of intolerance which they claim to decry. Their secret mantra is "Tolerance for all--all who hold to the same beliefs and ways." What is the system produced by the most "liberal" of liberals? "Communism," which of course is no such thing. It is merely totalitarianism by another name. Is it not ironic--would even be amusing were it not so vile--that the most extreme left and the most extreme right battle for the same turf?

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment	By	Date
I am reminded of the Chef who, when asked why there was no chicken on his menu, answered "Because nobody... [MORE]	Tad Lyon	Dec 6, 2007 16:29
What an atrocious policy. I can only hope this article skewed the University's position. But having seen the uproar over... [MORE]	Mark Serrato	Nov 29, 2007 03:26
It is a very discouraging sign of our times that law professors battle fully constitutional law. The constitution in many... [MORE]	Wilm E. Donath	Nov 28, 2007 19:35
Above ALL else, the factor that blatantly demonstrates the hypocrisy of the vast majority of highly voluable and visible liberal...	John Spencer Yantiss	Nov 28, 2007 18:12
If any type of major incident occurred at Stanford that required National Guard Assistance, would Dean Kramer call the Governor... [MORE]	Victoria Brown	Nov 28, 2007 13:07

Reader comment on:Stanford's Catch-22

Other reader comments on this article

Comment on Stanford's Catch-22

Reader comment on:
Stanford's Catch-22