It is a very discouraging sign of our times that law professors battle fully constitutional law. The constitution in many ways recognizes the need for a military establishment. Both Democratic and Republican Presidents have used our military to protect the interests of our nation. It is worthwhile mentioning Jefferson, who fought the Barbary pirates in the early part of the 19th century. This war was not unlike our present engagements and was fought successfully by our navy and marines ( ...to the shores of Tripoli! ).
Do these professors think that we, the citizens of this country, can live good lives without armed forces to protect this nation? without honoring those who risk their lives to protect this country? and where would they be if they were not protected?
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
I am reminded of the Chef who, when asked why there was no chicken on his menu, answered "Because nobody... [MORE]
Tad Lyon
Dec 6, 2007 16:29
What an atrocious policy. I can only hope this article skewed the University's position. But having seen the uproar over... [MORE]
Mark Serrato
Nov 29, 2007 03:26
It is a very discouraging sign of our times that law professors battle fully constitutional law. The constitution in many...
Wilm E. Donath
Nov 28, 2007 19:35
Above ALL else, the factor that blatantly demonstrates the hypocrisy of the vast majority of highly voluable and visible liberal... [MORE]
John Spencer Yantiss
Nov 28, 2007 18:12
If any type of major incident occurred at Stanford that required National Guard Assistance, would Dean Kramer call the Governor... [MORE]
Victoria Brown
Nov 28, 2007 13:07
Comment on Stanford's Catch-22
Would You Like to Become a Sustaining Subscriber of the Sun? Sign up now