Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Stanford's Catch-22

Submitted by Wilm E. Donath, Nov 28, 2007 19:35

It is a very discouraging sign of our times that law professors battle fully constitutional law. The constitution in many ways recognizes the need for a military establishment. Both Democratic and Republican Presidents have used our military to protect the interests of our nation. It is worthwhile mentioning Jefferson, who fought the Barbary pirates in the early part of the 19th century. This war was not unlike our present engagements and was fought successfully by our navy and marines ( ...to the shores of Tripoli! ).
Do these professors think that we, the citizens of this country, can live good lives without armed forces to protect this nation? without honoring those who risk their lives to protect this country? and where would they be if they were not protected?


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

I am reminded of the Chef who, when asked why there was no chicken on his menu, answered "Because nobody... [MORE]

Tad Lyon 

Dec 6, 2007 16:29

What an atrocious policy. I can only hope this article skewed the University's position. But having seen the uproar over... [MORE]

Mark Serrato 

Nov 29, 2007 03:26

It is a very discouraging sign of our times that law professors battle fully constitutional law. The constitution in many...

Wilm E. Donath 

Nov 28, 2007 19:35

Above ALL else, the factor that blatantly demonstrates the hypocrisy of the vast majority of highly voluable and visible liberal... [MORE]

John Spencer Yantiss 

Nov 28, 2007 18:12

If any type of major incident occurred at Stanford that required National Guard Assistance, would Dean Kramer call the Governor... [MORE]

Victoria Brown 

Nov 28, 2007 13:07

Comment on Stanford's Catch-22

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.