Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Debate Sparked Over Seized Soviet Uranium

Submitted by MTGRAY, Nov 30, 2007 10:54

i recall years ago the DOE was pushing the fact that small doses of Uranium was harmless, the other point was small doses would act like a protection in the event of a nuclear war.(immune system theory) of course at this time it was promoted and made legal in some food chains to radiate foods. Great trick, but destructive in the long run. there are no medical records on how many diseases related there of in the past 5 decades known. if so the records are under the national security act. the collapse of the soviet union was also at the time a front-line of black market uranium. most runners were from the eastern blocks.Most buyers were western europeans germany seemed to have the most cases of transport and purchase. Why would the germans need uranium?. Mr Albright statements and alexander Glaser seem to be sitting on their thrones. Any transactions related to dangerous chemicals no matter the size and volume is a concern,here nothing should be written off as not important. theses academic scientist should be discharged. but to prove their point let them eat the uranium-235 then maybe we can agree with that they are correct.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

i recall years ago the DOE was pushing the fact that small doses of Uranium was harmless, the other point...

MTGRAY 

Nov 30, 2007 10:54

Comment on Debate Sparked Over Seized Soviet Uranium

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.