Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Weingarten Sees Support For Merit Pay

Submitted by David Donsky, Nov 30, 2007 14:47

In response to the article "Weingarten Sees Support For Merit Pay," my colleagues and I turned down the proposal because it was insulting and ridiculous. Implicit in the offer are the underlying beliefs that: 1) teachers are currently not trying to do their best and 2) teachers are only interested in their paychecks. Our priority as teachers has always been, and continues to be, the education and success of our students. Our dedication is to our work. To accept this offer would imply our values were otherwise.

The "success" of the program is a foregone conclusion and a farce. A year from now, undoubtedly, many schools will be lauded for having met the benchmarks. Bloomberg and Klein will trumpet the success of this pilot program. In fact, these schools would have achieved the exact same improvement without the bonuses. If there is a school that wouldn't have improved were it not for cash incentives, that's shameful.

David Donsky, UFT Chapter Leader

Bushwick Community High School


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

In response to the article "Weingarten Sees Support For Merit Pay," my colleagues and I turned down the proposal because...

David Donsky 

Nov 30, 2007 14:47

Comment on Weingarten Sees Support For Merit Pay

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.