Mr Kirsch sets up a false dichotomy when he says it is either to sit in peace under one's own fig tree or to convert the heathen.
The Christian God offers both, indeed one is not fit to convert the heathen until he has learned the art of sitting at peace under his own fig tree. Any kind of converting done without peace is an obscenity I have witnessed time and time again among the christian fundamentalists. It's premises are heresy and its results blacken the name of the Church and of God Himself
I am ceasing to have the tensions that the author describes as bedevilling Mr Walzer because for me, though my fig tree may be figurative, my God is not.
The freedom I am fast approaching attainment of is that not given by the world, therefore it is not in the purview of the state.
But being given not by the world, but by God Himself, no man wil ever be able to take ti from me. So the questions that perplex both the author of the article reviewed and the reviewer become distant memories
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
A good essay. I like the clear explanations of the terms used in the original. I especially like the use... [MORE]
pat
Jan 28, 2008 01:58
I'm perplexed by the move from "there are no objective standards by which we can judge other cultures" to "the... [MORE]
matt r
Dec 23, 2007 22:49
Liberalism and socialism are incompatible. They are polar opposites. [MORE]
Robert Lynn
Dec 16, 2007 20:26
According to Mr. Kirsch, "Mr. Walzer takes for granted that the way to remedy the injustice of exclusion is an... [MORE]
Dan
Dec 14, 2007 17:56
mr. waltzer wrote a very interesting, if elliptical, account of the emergence of the parliamentary mentality and its agent, the... [MORE]
dano
Dec 17, 2007 13:54
Mr Kirsch sets up a false dichotomy when he says it is either to sit in peace under one's own...