Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
By the Numbers

Submitted by Ethan, Dec 17, 2007 01:09

•Emissions from the U.S. increased 6.6%.

A plurality of the world's emmissions come from the United States - with 25% of the world's total emmissions and only 4% of the worlds total population. A 6% emmissions increase for the United States means alot more than an 10% emmission increase among "signers". Someone with a salary of $100 getting a 100% salary increase isnt going to mean as much as someone making $1,000,000 getting a 1% salary increase.

Confusion of percentages versus actual quantity means misleading statistics and a misleading article.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

I live in a big city, like most of us probably. Hundreds of city classrooms stand empty but schools remain... [MORE]

Gary Miller 

Dec 20, 2007 23:01

John House. Steyn is a very opinionated columnist , and without question infuriating to those who disagree with his viiews,... [MORE]

neil gaffney 

Dec 18, 2007 00:26

While I appreciate statistics and consider them within a context. My overwhelming experience is that global warming is real. Mr.... [MORE]

John House 

Dec 18, 2007 22:45

I am intrigued by the claims of John 'Green' House to have certain "overwhelming experience" that "global warming is real". Does... [MORE]

Geraint Roberts 

Dec 19, 2007 17:38

Cheer up, Mr. Steyn. There may be a purpose behind the mental illness gripping the world's elites. In "Anatomy of Criticism"... [MORE]

Robert Arvanitis 

Dec 17, 2007 21:35

I try to read news from around the world. My readings reflect little currency for the opinions Mr. Steyn fears.... [MORE]

John House 

Dec 17, 2007 20:35

Mr. House, your argument that global warming must be true based on your personal experience is absolutely absurd. "Obvious, if... [MORE]

Lynn 

Dec 19, 2007 10:50

Lynn, I remember when cattle egrets were seldom seen in Central Illinois. I now see many. I remember when trees... [MORE]

John House 

Dec 19, 2007 23:46

Mr. House, I would argue that rather than using reason, which would see an individual's personal experience as insigificant in the... [MORE]

Lynn 

Dec 20, 2007 10:55

Lynn, thank you for your correction of my typo. Thank you also for the reference. I have book marked it... [MORE]

John House 

Dec 20, 2007 22:36

While your story about faith is indeed moving, it is not what I mean when I say that your view... [MORE]

Lynn 

Dec 21, 2007 10:20

The real question, of course, is whether global warming is anthropogenic in nature, or just a repeat of the macro-trend... [MORE]

john twinem 

Dec 21, 2007 10:58

I think Thomas Malthus and Paul Erlich were fundamentally incorrect, and Western thought is pathetically slow to catch it.  I... [MORE]

John House 

Dec 24, 2007 23:05

There are some statistics you can argue over, but the basic numbers tell the story. In 2004, the last year... [MORE]

Neil 

Dec 17, 2007 17:09

I believe that we will soon (less than 10 years from now) use solar energy to make fuels in significant... [MORE]

Wilm E. Donath 

Dec 17, 2007 12:38

•Emissions from the U.S. increased 6.6%. A plurality of the world's emmissions come from the United States - with 25% of...

Ethan 

Dec 17, 2007 01:09

Ethan might be more convincing if he could spell emissions. Carbon dioxide emissions are not poison, but fertilizer for the plant... [MORE]

tarkus 

Dec 17, 2007 03:08

I think (correct me if I'm wrong) the Kyoto protocol was to reduce emissions by percentage amounts. So by showing... [MORE]

Keith 

Dec 17, 2007 10:03

Sirs, Whether Mark Steyn's right or wrong matters not. It's the basic premise of the global ecochondriacs that's erroneous. On page... [MORE]

Boris Bell 

Dec 17, 2007 14:53

Regardless of the fact that the US is the leading source of emissions, Steyn's point is simply that the US... [MORE]

jon 

Dec 17, 2007 15:20

Regardless of the fact that the US is the leading source of emissions, Steyn's point is simply that the US... [MORE]

Jon 

Dec 17, 2007 15:21

Ethan, Your rounding seems to only work in one direction. While it may be nit picking: US pop = 4.57% of world... [MORE]

David 

Dec 17, 2007 16:00

According to the World Bank figures for 2006, The US economy accounts for 27.4% of the world economy. siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GDP.pdf So what we... [MORE]

Deluded By Dawkins 

Dec 20, 2007 08:13

Comment on By the Numbers

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.