Not really. They're over-landmarking. - Reader comments at The New York Sun

Reader comment on:
DUMBO Area Gets Landmarked
in response to reader comment: Um, you're kind of over-reacting

Submitted by Bapopik@aol.com, Dec 19, 2007 22:18

Yes, I knew about Yankee Stadium. It was altered in 1975--AFTER the LPC was formed. Yankee Stadium is still special. (Not that I'm advocating landmarking the outdated building.) I find it very difficult to believe that Yankee Stadium is not a New York City landmark and, for example, some unremarkable buildings in the City & Suburban Houses are New York City landmarks.

An eyesore of a Domino's plant is a landmark? The unremarkable housing complex on East 66th Street is a landmark? Nothing can change about them, ever?

I guess we'll respectfully disagree.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment	By	Date
One more point. This is on the Dept. of Buildings website: The NYC Department of Buildings ensures the safe and... [MORE]	Bary Popik	Dec 19, 2007 23:02
NINETY historic districts? Is New York City really THAT special? One of the most historic buildings of them all--Yankee Stadium--is being... [MORE]	Barry Popik	Dec 19, 2007 14:33
As there are appx 2.2 million buildings in the five boroughs of NYC so I think you're over-reacting just a... [MORE]	Katherine	Dec 19, 2007 18:59
Yes, I knew about Yankee Stadium. It was altered in 1975--AFTER the LPC was formed. Yankee Stadium is still special....	Bapopik@aol.com	Dec 19, 2007 22:18
There are thousands of buildings in NYC that have been landmarked and are still worth landmarking. But it's more than... [MORE]	RJ	Jan 10, 2008 11:05