Disgruntled union members who hide behind pseudonyms in the blogosphere is an inadequate way of holding unions accountable to their membership. Becoming involved, as you so aptly suggest, is a much better method.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that most if not all the current commenters on this story are union... [MORE]
Peterk
Dec 25, 2007 11:25
I am not nor ever have been a Union member, Peterk, however, I am a stockholder. And I CANNOT find... [MORE]
Kim Pontiac
Jan 9, 2008 11:20
Diana Furchgott-Roth takes a snapshot in time and proceeds to make an argue without any historical context. If the current... [MORE]
Robert Wechsler
Dec 19, 2007 22:26
As a stockholder, where does one find a company's salary and expenditure info such as is available about a union... [MORE]
Kim Pontiac
Dec 19, 2007 20:41
Diana Furchgott-Roth's column, "Keeping Unions Accountable", entirely misses the central issue facing the current leadership of the Department of Labor.... [MORE]
Scott Lilly
Dec 19, 2007 10:02
Ms. Furchtgott-Roth is concerned that union spending and leadership salaries are hidden from the membership, if not for the DOL... [MORE]
Kathleen Conlan
Dec 19, 2007 09:41
Disgruntled union members who hide behind pseudonyms in the blogosphere is an inadequate way of holding unions accountable to their...