Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Engagement Goes Sour, But Both Love the Ring

Submitted by Richard Dey, Dec 27, 2007 23:25

An engagement ring is not a promise to pay, but it is a proposal for a contract of marriage..

If she returns the ring, she refuses the offer of the contract. If she does not automatically return the ring, the engagement from her point of view isn't broken.

If he asks for the ring to be returned and she refuses to return it, he has here learnt a $38,800 lesson which, on the sunny side of things, is less expensive than a 50:50 divorce in which he loses everything but his L. L. Bean boots.

On the good side, he doesn't have to return the $300,000 diamond ring she gave him for his membrum virile even if it looks better in its presentation box.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

An engagement ring is not a promise to pay, but it is a proposal for a contract of marriage.. If she...

Richard Dey 

Dec 27, 2007 23:25

Why would a woman want to keet a ring after the engagement broke off? Selfish I say, proper etiquette states... [MORE]

Engagement 

Oct 19, 2007 17:47

It doesn't matter who broke it off, she should return the ring. (And Emily Post disagrees with von Sperling on... [MORE]

amoeba 

Oct 19, 2007 13:44

Comment on Engagement Goes Sour, But Both Love the Ring

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.