Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
What if They're Wrong?

Submitted by L Baum, Jan 6, 2008 23:03

A sad time for Harvard. I read the original paper and the Dershowitz point-by-point rebuttal. The slant in the Mearsheimer/Walt paper was obvious from the start. They clearly had their agenda. It seems like a pretty clear case of -dare I say it- anti-semitism to me. The biggest problem is that their scholarly disguise, the Harvard stamp of approval, and the resulting wide spread press might really influence the general reader to think that that Jews in America should not be given the right to present their case. How un-American! Thank you Mr. Dershowitz and Mr. Gitell.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

A sad time for Harvard. I read the original paper and the Dershowitz point-by-point rebuttal. The slant in the Mearsheimer/Walt...

L Baum 

Jan 6, 2008 23:03

"what if public opinion in those countries (Saudi Arabia, Jordan, etc.) is wrong?" (Gitell, 2007) to make a balance, I would... [MORE]

Indra 

Aug 2, 2007 01:20

Only a Saint could sit and listen to the vile attempts to cover up anti-semitism in their wish to eliminate... [MORE]

Dorothy Wachsstock 

Jun 10, 2007 19:38

Thank you for giving us this information about Mr. Walt. I did not realize how critical he is of the... [MORE]

Naomi Steinberger 

Jun 10, 2007 12:03

I agree. [MORE]

Donna Light 

Jun 10, 2007 01:42

Comment on What if They're Wrong?

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.