So, given that rights aren't absolute and reasonable restrictions can be made for specific reasons, what is it about *all* the residents in Washington, D.C. that makes it prudent to remove from them their right to keep and bear arms?
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
OK, Obama believes that the 2nd Amendment provides an individual's right to bear arms. What he supports are a communities'... [MORE]
Julia
Mar 18, 2008 11:13
Almost nobody thinks a criminal should have the right to own a gun. What Senator Obama is saying is that... [MORE]