Re: Liberalism isn't enough - Reader comments at The New York Sun

Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Freedom For Religion
in response to reader comment: liberalism is not enough

Submitted by Bill in DC, Feb 28, 2008 22:50

Fender claims Nussbaum has yet to comment on religious violence. In fact, she is well aware of such things; her book-length treatment of violence in India (The Clash Within) addresses, particularly, Hindu-Muslim relations.

Moreover, I'd point to several societies that have achieved a space for the public exercise of reason and for individual freedom that are not themselves Jude-Christian: Turkey, Japan, Korea, and India all are strong, functioning democracies.

No doubt that the Judeo-Christian tradition, heavily influenced by (pagan) Greek philosophy, was important for the development of distinction between the public and private spheres; but no matter my debt to them, I am not my parents. So too in intellectual history -- lest we confuse Marxism with Judaism or the KKK with Christianity.

As far as Fender's point that "liberalism depends on inchoate emotions and irrationalities," may I recommend Nussbaum's excellent Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Since I presume my interlocutor a Christian, I would heartily agree: the very act of forming a judgment, like all acts, is predicated on emotion. But I'd suggest that Nussbaum is hardly unaware of this idea.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment	By	Date
Fr. Neuhaus is an extraordinarily intelligent critic who exemplifies the qualities he attacks in Professor Nussbaum. Any long time reader... [MORE]	Jim Clark	Mar 22, 2008 09:54
Roger Williams defended Native Americans, saw us as "one blood" with them and was against forced conversions. He was against... [MORE]	Gretchen Robinson	Mar 10, 2008 15:52
Father Neuhaus's critique suggests again that a key, perhaps THE key of any argument is its ethos dimension, i.e. the... [MORE]	George T. Karnezis	Mar 4, 2008 14:24
Father Neuhaus, Your attempt to discredit Nussbaum's contention that Roger William's conclusions about religious freedom, which he based on his... [MORE]	curious sampler	Mar 3, 2008 19:34
We know the USA is a failed social experiment and every time a new change is introduced to diversify USA... [MORE]	HRossner	Mar 2, 2008 15:44
Father Neuhaus criticizes Nussbaum for missing the fact that religious conviction has been the grounds for the defense of religious... [MORE]	John Hacker-Wright	Feb 29, 2008 08:43
According to what Hacker-Wright is saying, Neuhaus has misread Williams, not Rawls. But Neuhaus's only point about Williams is that... [MORE]	Michael Mattair	Mar 5, 2008 14:09
Just because a view is a product of another does not mean it is essentially tied to that view. Nussbaum... [MORE]	John Hacker-Wright	Mar 12, 2008 13:13
There was once a time not so long ago when comments such as those of Father Neuhaus would have evoked... [MORE]	Stephen R. Marks	Feb 29, 2008 02:48
I seriously doubt that Jefferson, the man that removed all mention of miracles from his version of the bible and... [MORE]	Corey Long	Feb 28, 2008 17:47
Thank you for the review of Nussbaum's new work. It is clear where Father Neuhaus is coming from in his... [MORE]	Jim H.	Feb 28, 2008 13:07
in order to have freedom of any sort there has to be order and law. people have to refrain from... [MORE]	Fender	Feb 28, 2008 10:22
Fender claims Nussbaum has yet to comment on religious violence. In fact, she is well aware of such things; her...	Bill in DC	Feb 28, 2008 22:50

Reader comment on:Freedom For Religionin response to reader comment: liberalism is not enough

Other reader comments on this article

Comment on Freedom For Religion

Reader comment on:
Freedom For Religion
in response to reader comment: liberalism is not enough