Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Elections Board Could Face Grilling Over Primary Numbers

Submitted by Hanan, Mar 4, 2008 00:19

It is now March 3 and there does not appear to be a certification of the 2008 Democratic primary vote in New York City. Are we waiting until after the crucial March 4th primaries before announcing the Sen. Clinton has lost a few delegates to Sen. Obama as a result of the new tally?

Is this a conspiracy or a convergence of silence in order to not diminish the Clinton in her home state? What about the interest of the voters?

Where is the story after February 26th that the vote has still not been certified???? Is the Borad of Elections buying time? What's the rationale for not having the vote certified and the results released now?

New York City voters WANT TO KNOW????!!!!


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

It is now March 3 and there does not appear to be a certification of the 2008 Democratic primary vote...

Hanan 

Mar 4, 2008 00:19

I am not surprised that a Board of Elections that has very little transparency for its election results by precinct... [MORE]

Jay O'Callaghan 

Feb 19, 2008 23:53

Fire the workers. Henry-the Board of Elections has a hard enough time getting workers! I know how to get competent (?)... [MORE]

Kevin Dfuuy 

Feb 19, 2008 16:53

All poll workers are told that the Return of Canvas is a preliminary count and that the machines will be... [MORE]

Kevin Duffy 

Feb 19, 2008 16:39

It's absolutely amazing that this could happen in such a critical race, and that anyone with even a small brain... [MORE]

maurice gumbs 

Feb 19, 2008 12:24

Comment on Elections Board Could Face Grilling Over Primary Numbers

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.