A fine article; no complaint, but a quibble. No one who knows the work of Kierkegaard could possibly describe him as "humorless." "Joyless," perhaps, or "severe" or "lugubrious"; but humor he had in abundance.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
Poor Auden! In death he is a "stick for one and a shield the other". As to facts, I have... [MORE]
Barry Larking
Mar 14, 2008 05:11
In his poem, September 1, 1939, Auden speaks directly about the l930s as "a low dishonest decade." This would include... [MORE]
Paul Dresman
Mar 10, 2008 11:59
Nope, none of it works. He didn't go to New York to pass some literary baton, he didn't go to... [MORE]
Robert Smith
Mar 10, 2008 05:44
Humorlesss? My goodness. And to charge Auden's "cloudiness" to Kierkegaard seems a real injustice. Has Ormsby read the aesthete's volume... [MORE]
Jack Johnson
Mar 9, 2008 23:46
Auden's defection was the first of two times that a poet's actions sparked debated in the House of Commons (the... [MORE]
Daniel Heinde
Mar 9, 2008 19:26
To assert, as this critic does, that writing prose improved Auden's poetry reveals a tin ear for verse. I defy... [MORE]
lawrence richette
Mar 9, 2008 19:12
While it's true that Auden's literary cohort were pacifists, it is difficult to overstate how much Auden's private life factored... [MORE]
Deschanel
Mar 9, 2008 15:23
As an historian, Auden got it right, I am sure... [MORE]
Artemio Benavides
Mar 8, 2008 17:07
Was Auden so great that he had to be secreted away to England's strategic hinterland like the atomic bomb secrets... [MORE]
Toby Mottram
Mar 8, 2008 16:57
The master of ironic subversion of himself Kierkegaard was anything but humorless. [MORE]