Submitted by Raphael, Mar 10, 2008 03:40

LOOMING CATASTROPHE, A TICKING TIME BOMB

If you think the situation in Florida and Michigan is a big problem THINK AGAIN because what awaits the Democratic party is bigger than Michigan and Florida. Soon luck will smile on John McCain when the almighty SUPPER DELEGATES makes another mistake which I think they will in other to favor the Clinton's. The interest of the people should prevail over the Clinton's, that is the only way a Democratic president can be elected in November. The Clinton's are nothing but one family, Democratic party is a collection/group of people with common interest and goal. I don't think the Clinton's understands that especially otherwise she will not place McCain's interest above her fellow Democrat (Obama). I blame all uncommited supper delegates for not committing to Obama in outrage of this particular comment by the Clinton's. I cannot believe that a fellow Democrat will prefer a Republican to win. Not just any republican but John McCain, Mr. BOMB BOMB BOMB a third term of Georg W. Bush.
As far as I know election is a game of numbers, whether it's by delegates, states, popular votes or electoral votes, whichever way it's all about numbers. I still wonder how much longer the Clinton's are allowed to control American politics, the media, democratic party and voters. This is a family that can do anything to win irrespective of the consequences or whoever they may be hurting. They are ever ready to damage Obama and the party if they cannot win the most delegates. They are ready to hurt Obama to favor McCain. It is either the Clinton's or else they destroy the party. To say the least I quote, I have a life time experience that I will bring to the White House, John McCain have a life time experience he will bring to the white house and Obama has a speech. Can it be any worst and ruthless than this? How unpatriotic and selfish can the Clinton's be? it's unbelievable and unheard of a fellow member of the same party. Anyway it goes a long way to show how desperate the Clinton's want to clinch unto power and if they cannot have it then John McCain should instead of a fellow democrat. Did she say John McCain is better than Obama? A government that Americans are yawning to put out of office. She has consistently moved the post in her favor and no body is saying anything about it, even the chairman of democratic party cannot stand his ground on a decision all presidential candidates agreed to before campaign began. Each state she lost does not matter in the general election and caucus she lost are undemocratic too. When she lost in Iowa she said Iowa and Mississippi have never elected a woman before, like I said she does not think about tomorrow, she didn't know the race will take her to Mississippi, her plans ended on supper Tuesday. Today she swallow her pride to campaign in Mississippi. In the beginning she said the race is all about delegates because she thought she will be ahead but when Obama began to win more delegates she said it's all about momentum and not delegates. She lost caucuses and said they are undemocratic and her husband didn't do well in caucuses either. What is the difference between primaries and caucuses? When she lost most states she said the states does not matter because they are small states and will not win election in November. She admitted that Michigan and Florida will not count and when she began to loose she wants them to count. What matters now is wining the big states because they mean more than others especially Ohio. You are right Mrs. Perception, the momentum woman. I don't get it, the idea that Obama cannot with a big state in November is ridiculous and insanity, Clinton won Texas with less than 200 votes for God sake. Till date she has not apologized for her vote to authorize war in Iraq. The most important memo of our generation yet she did n't care to read it before voting. What a careless president she will be. Am I surprised? Not at all, after all her campaign is the biggest enterprise she ever ran as chief executive and we have seen how good she handled it. Will she say the same thing she is saying now if she is ahead in states, popular votes and delegates? She has no basis for argument period. My question is how many more times will they move the goal post before someone braves up and tell them ENOUGH. Nominating a presidential candidate has no other process but winning primaries, caucuses and accumulating delegates, it has no short cut, it's not by winning a big the states, nor by the number of states won. I don't care if Obama won 100 states and popular votes or not, neither do I care whether Hillary Clinton won 800 biggest states, all I care about is who won the most delegates? Even if it is just one delegate ahead the person should be the nominee period. You cannot come from behind to win the nomination it will split democratic Party beyond repair. Republicans are anxiously waiting for that moment. Democrats will loose black votes and all the young people Obama brought back to participate in this process including Obamacins and independents. Can Hillary Clinton win without independents, blacks, younger voters and Obamacins? If she can't win the most delegate she should try some other time otherwise the excitement in the Democratic party will fade into thin air and John McCain will have a free ride to the presidency. SUPPER DELEGATES please don't destroy the party to favor someone, do the right thing. The problem you have in Florida and Michigan is a tip of the iceberg compared to what will happen to if the nomination is stolen from whoever has the most delegates. A word is enough for the wise. She has been asked to release her tax returns and other related documents since they left office. Will she release all the records as demanded by the Obama campaign or will she release what she wants the public to see? Your guess is as good as mine, I don't think she will release everything. Do we need another 4years of the most secretive presidency? Do we want the wife of Monica Lewinsky's X boyfriend in the White House again? Hell No, we have hard enough of their nonsense and it's time to move on. We want change and Hillary Clinton is not part of it, not even close. She is a POLARIZE figure, self centered and fighter. We have been divided and fighting for too long and wants no more of it. We want someone that can unit us as a country, someone like Obama. Can't we get it? People like Pat Buchanan are on MSNBC network all day suggesting how the Clinton's should twist the hands of supper delegates to squeeze the nomination from them but he refused to talk about the aftermath. No Obama supporter will participate in November and that's a big lose for democrats. Again Pat Buchanan, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and their surrogates are delusional to suggest that Obama should take the back seat (vice president). On what grounds should he accepts vice presidents position if he wins the most delegates? This suggestion is as delusional as those suggesting it. That is what I am talking about, 'DESPERATION'. Hillary Clinton will be 72years before November. 8 (eight years) from now she will be 70 years old and her hopes and aspirations to become president will be washed away so it's do or die now. But should this be a reason to push a winner to the back seat? I don't think so, unfortunately she cannot catch up. There should be no rational to becoming the nominee but to win the most delegates and The earlier she begin to come to terms with realities that she will not be the nominee the better for her. I know she will not quit because the Clinton's care about themselves alone, they don't think about tomorrow or the future of the party. When will Hillary Clinton begin to take responsibility for her actions? She have someone to blame at all times, she blamed George Bush for her vote to go to war in Iraq, she blamed caucuses for being democratic, she blamed the media for her baggage of dirt, she blamed Iowa and Mississippi for her lose in Iowa. She blamed her husband for NAFTA, When she ran for election in New York she promised to create 2000 jobs, did she keep her words? Big fat No and yet the media are not asking these questions. She is promising more this time. Why should we believe her? SAME OLD, SAME OLD CAMPAIGN RHETORIC .

Raphael
(San Antonio, Texas)

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.