Submitted by Chuck, Dec 22, 2006 17:40

The solution of coming up with another name is a good balance. Making civil union equivelant to marriage is something the people should decide, not judges. Can the new civil unions title be used to define the relationship between more than 2 people? Can it be used to define the relationship between a male and a female? How about two brothers or two sisters? What about a human and an animal, or two animals? I think the new law is a little vague and arbitrary.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.