Adam Kirsch is one of the best book- reviewes now writing. I have read quite a few of his truly outstanding reviews and learned much from them. Here however he does something I believe no good reviewer should do. He tells us repeatedly how bad and how lacking the book being reviewed is. He could have done this in a sentence. But in focusing on the lacks of the book he does not add to our knowledge, appreciation enjoyment and understanding of the life of Joseph Conrad. A better review would have brought in a great deal of information, and insight into the life of Conrad. .
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
Adam Kirsch is one of the best book- reviewes now writing. I have read quite a few of his truly...
Shalom Freedman
Mar 11, 2008 05:21
Conrad is an artist who reflects the imperial exploitation of the African in the Belgian Congo. Adam Kirsch has revealed... [MORE]
Robin Todd
Mar 11, 2008 20:31
What is wrong with pedantry. Learn the facts about his life. Read his books. With your own experiences and your... [MORE]
James Trigg
Mar 10, 2008 11:49
"...and finally with sublime relentlessness..." Ah, Mr. Kirsch, you do write a good review, all the way to "a passion... [MORE]
Waimea Williams
Mar 10, 2008 11:47
if mr. stape indeed "gives a full chronicle of Conrad's life from birth to death," he has done readers... [MORE]
jimbo
Mar 10, 2008 09:42
I don't know who to feel sorrier for, Conrad or the biographer. But the reviewer makes an important point about... [MORE]