Submitted by OCULUS, Mar 20, 2008 21:12

Why is it that responsible editors put this speculative fear mongering on the front page? These warmists have no more credibility now than they did billions of wasted dollars ago on this kind of cheesy speculation . Sure they hide behind their institutional titles but who is challenging their premises on these expensive studies that prove NOTHING? Their peers, that's who; more of the same.

The least the media could do is to demand their hypothesis and what justified the funding for it; in just about every instance, it's jingoism without a thought to its fundamental "truth" other than a bunch of computer models, based on "some" set of data probably from NASA; and we remember how accurate those are.

Please , demand more before publishing this high-flown windage.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.